Connected mountain intelligence
Resort Network
Compare ski resorts through structural peers, live weather twins, snow-history peers, contrasts and practical alternatives.
Ski areas1,049
Relations24
SeasonShoulder season
UpdatedThu 13:15
One starting resort, three comparison questions
Choose the relationship before you choose the alternative.
Use stable structure when you want a comparable mountain, current-condition relationships when you want to understand today’s difference, and alternative links when you need a practical fallback.
Current network focus · ski area 2038
Tenna
Tenna is best understood as a family progression base: easier terrain, moderate gradients and usable access make progression the strongest structural story.
Family progression baseSwitzerlandTop 1,780 mSupportive current weatherLower current weather risk
Current evidence93/100
Opportunity95.3/100
Caution16/100
Confidence82%
Since the last update
The current mountain setup has improved.
Opportunity improved.
Opportunity improved +12
What the network means
Compare Tenna by question, not by one generic similarity score.
Tenna is best understood as a family progression base: easier terrain, moderate gradients and usable access make progression the strongest structural story.
Worth watching
The resort is becoming more interesting now.
P209 detected a material improving shift in the accepted current read.
New 82% evidenceRising Opportunity ranking influence off
Resort network
Structurally similar mountains
The closest match in altitude, terrain mix, scale, aspect and snow-reliability evidence.
Italy
88.5%SimilarityMonte Chiappo
Similar altitude, terrain mix, scale and reliability.
France
82.3%SimilarityPuyvalador Rieutord
Similar altitude, terrain mix, scale and reliability.
France
82%SimilarityAillons Margeriaz
Similar altitude, terrain mix, scale and reliability.
France
80.8%SimilarityHautacam
Similar altitude, terrain mix, scale and reliability.
France
78.9%SimilarityGoulier
Similar altitude, terrain mix, scale and reliability.
Germany
78.1%SimilarityRossfeld
Similar altitude, terrain mix, scale and reliability.
Resort network
Same personality
Different ski areas sharing the same dominant structural archetype.
Italy
95.2%SimilarityMonte Chiappo
Same dominant resort personality with overlapping secondary traits and comparable mountain structure.
France
92.6%SimilarityPuyvalador Rieutord
Same dominant resort personality with overlapping secondary traits and comparable mountain structure.
France
92.4%SimilarityAillons Margeriaz
Same dominant resort personality with overlapping secondary traits and comparable mountain structure.
France
91.9%SimilarityHautacam
Same dominant resort personality with overlapping secondary traits and comparable mountain structure.
France
91.1%SimilarityGoulier
Same dominant resort personality with overlapping secondary traits and comparable mountain structure.
Germany
90.8%SimilarityRossfeld
Same dominant resort personality with overlapping secondary traits and comparable mountain structure.
Resort network
Long-run snow peers
Comparable historical snow-reliability and upper-mountain context.
Slovenia
98.3%SimilarityBohinj Vogel
Comparable long-run snow reliability and upper-mountain altitude.
Austria
96.4%SimilarityBezau
Comparable long-run snow reliability and upper-mountain altitude.
Austria
95.9%SimilarityMuttereralm
Comparable long-run snow reliability and upper-mountain altitude.
Austria
95.8%SimilarityBiberwier Marienberg
Comparable long-run snow reliability and upper-mountain altitude.
France
95.7%SimilarityAutrans
Comparable long-run snow reliability and upper-mountain altitude.
Italy
95.2%SimilarityMonte Chiappo
Comparable long-run snow reliability and upper-mountain altitude.
Resort network
Nearby alternatives
Related choices close enough to matter when changing destination.
Italy
100/100Relationship strengthFolgaria Lavarone Luserna
Nearby alternative within the same broad Alpine travel radius.
Italy
100/100Relationship strengthLavarone Rivetta
Nearby alternative within the same broad Alpine travel radius.
Italy
100/100Relationship strengthMonte Bondone
Nearby alternative within the same broad Alpine travel radius.
Italy
100/100Relationship strengthPanarotta 2002
Nearby alternative within the same broad Alpine travel radius.
Italy
95.8/100Relationship strengthPaganella
Nearby alternative within the same broad Alpine travel radius.
Italy
92.6/100Relationship strengthAsiago
Nearby alternative within the same broad Alpine travel radius.
How relationships stay interpretable
Stable structure and live conditions refresh independently.
A resort can remain a structural twin while becoming a poor condition twin today. Keeping those layers separate makes the relationship explainable and prevents short-lived weather from rewriting the mountain itself.
02 hstructural graph freshness
05 minlive overlay freshness
0public graph-build SQL