Pertisau am Achensee
Leads on good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 48/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.
Strongest alternativeWildschonau
Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.
What could change the resultIf snow receives about 50% more weight, Wildschonau becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 2–2.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Why Pertisau am Achensee leads Wildschonau · 6.7 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.
Priority sensitivity · what can change the winner?
If snow receives about 50% more weight, Wildschonau becomes the leading option.
If terrain receives about 50% more weight, Wildschonau becomes the leading option.
If scale receives about 50% more weight, Wildschonau becomes the leading option.