Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Molltaler Gletscher is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, exceptional reliability match · 90/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Arnoldstein is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Recommended

Molltaler Gletscher

66/100

Why

Molltaler Gletscher is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, exceptional reliability match · 90/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Arnoldstein is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Mixed evidenceUpdated 16 h ago

Solid upper-mountain snow base at 180 cm.

AlternativeArnoldstein

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Molltaler Gletscher

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choice

Leads on good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, exceptional reliability match · 90/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Molltaler Gletscher leads Arnoldstein Snow reliability +8.4 pts and Access +4.7 pts

Snow reliability +8.4Terrain fit -6.7Access +4.7Snow now +4.2

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeArnoldstein

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

What could change the resultReduce snow weight from 24 to 1 and Arnoldstein becomes the leading option.

Lead margin10.6pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence64%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

SnowArnoldstein

Reduce snow weight from 24 to 1 and Arnoldstein becomes the leading option.

24 → 1

Lift systemArnoldstein

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 72 and Arnoldstein becomes the leading option.

14 → 72

Family & valueArnoldstein

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 79 and Arnoldstein becomes the leading option.

12 → 79

Why Molltaler Gletscher leads Arnoldstein · 10.6 pts

Snow+8.4 pts

Access+4.7 pts

Lift system-4.2 pts

Current opportunity+4.2 pts

Family & value-3.5 pts

Scale+1.1 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Molltaler Gletscher

#1 · Molltaler Gletscher · Austria

Decision66/100

Fit71/100

Now31/100

Quality7.5/10

Now31180 cm upperReliability9090/100Terrain6969/100Access46124 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit71.186% weight Now30.914% weight Decision65.6/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow90/100 · 37% evidence 21.7 / 24.0 pts

Terrain84/100 · 52% evidence 18.5 / 22.0 pts

Scale79/100 · 100% evidence 12.6 / 16.0 pts

Lift system41/100 · 68% evidence 5.8 / 14.0 pts

Access46/100 · 68% evidence 5.5 / 12.0 pts

Family & value60/100 · 41% evidence 7.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow180 cm 25.7 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow108 cm 5.1 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useSnow-first trips · 77/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area36 km · 1,014 m verticalBest transfer124 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 278% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.

Strengths

Good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Exceptional reliability match · 90/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Arnoldstein

#2 · Dreilandereck Arnoldstein · Austria

Decision55/100

Fit55/100

Now0/100

Quality4.5/10

Now00 cm freshReliability3838/100Terrain6262/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit55.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision55.0/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow38/100 · 73% evidence 10.3 / 27.3 pts

Terrain65/100 · 80% evidence 16.1 / 25.0 pts

Scale54/100 · 85% evidence 9.8 / 18.2 pts

Lift system58/100 · 68% evidence 9.2 / 15.9 pts

Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 9.6 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useFamily trips · 58/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area14 km · 872 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Current dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 62/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Mixed reliability match · 38/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Annenheim

#3 · · Austria

Decision43/100

Fit43/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Access43122 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit43.0100% weight Now–0% weight Decision43.0/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Access43/100 · 48% evidence 43.0 / 100.0 pts

Family & valueNo data excluded

Lift systemNo data excluded

ScaleNo data excluded

SnowNo data excluded

TerrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 6%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeAccess-led destinationSnow reliabilityNot availableSki area– · – verticalBest transfer122 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected date

Strengths

Mixed access match · 43/100 — led by practical access; partial evidence..
Access is the strongest available structural dimension.

Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	Molltaler GletscherMolltaler Gletscher	ArnoldsteinDreilandereck Arnoldstein	AnnenheimAustria
Assessment
Decision score	66/100clear advantage	55/100	43/100
Structural Fit	71/100clear advantage	55/100	43/100
Current opportunity	31/100clear advantage	0/100	–
Overall quality	7.5/10clear advantage	4.5/10	–
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Medium	Low
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	81/100clear advantage	46/100	–
Typical daytime high	0°Cclear advantage	4°C	–
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–	–
Typical overnight low	-5°C	-4°C	–
Rating	6.8/10clear advantage	5.8/10	–
Area size class	20–50 km	20 km or less	–
Ability profile	expert	advanced	–
Price class	avg	avg	–
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	36 kmclear advantage	14 km	–
Lowest point	2,108 mclear advantage	680 m	–
Highest point	3,122 mclear advantage	1,552 m	–
Vertical range	1,014 m	872 m	–
Blue pistes	18%	35%	–
Red pistes	56%	53%	–
Black pistes	26%clear advantage	12%	–
Terrain above 2,000 m	–	0%	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	–	0%	–
Piste-mix diversity	90/100	87/100	–
Slope-angle diversity	–	62/100	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	–	3%	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	Well above typical+278% vs average · 99th percentile	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	Well below typical-100% vs average · 0th percentile	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	0 cm	–	–
Mid-mountain snow	108 cm	–	–
Mountain snow	180 cm	–	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm	–
Snow quality	–	–	–
Snow alert	1 cm	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–	–
Open lifts	–	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	394 pph/km	556 pph/kmclear advantage	–
Lift-system coverage	0.30×	0.37×	–
Terrain per lift	4.5 km/lift	1.9 km/lift	–
Weather
Minimum temperature	-1°C	15°C	8°C
Maximum temperature	5°C	18°C	19°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	–	–	–
Piste variety	–	–	–
Off-piste	–	–	–
Cross-country	–	–	–
Lift network	lifts	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–	–
Après-ski	–	–	–
Public transport	–	–	–
Best airport transfer	124 min	–	122 min
Skiing per transfer hour	17 km/h transfer	–	–

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Molltaler Gletscher

Molltaler Gletscher

Resort overview

Molltaler Gletscher

Arnoldstein

Annenheim

Detailed comparison