Helm
Effectively tied with Tarvisio. good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 45/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.
Strongest alternativeTarvisio
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Tarvisio is small. Some requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.
What could change the resultIncrease terrain weight from 22 to 24 and Tarvisio becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–2.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Increase terrain weight from 22 to 24 and Tarvisio becomes the leading option.
Reduce access weight from 12 to 10 and Tarvisio becomes the leading option.
Reduce lift system weight from 14 to 11 and Tarvisio becomes the leading option.
Reduce scale weight from 16 to 8 and Tarvisio becomes the leading option.
Why Helm leads Tarvisio · 0.5 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.