Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Gitschberg Jochtal is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Sankt Veit in Defereggental is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Recommended

Gitschberg Jochtal

66/100

Why

Gitschberg Jochtal is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Sankt Veit in Defereggental is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago

Structural fit score: 66/100.

Supporting data are stale; treat the ranking as provisional.

AlternativeSankt Veit in Defereggental

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Gitschberg Jochtal

Large-domain explorerLow-regret choice

Leads on good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Gitschberg Jochtal leads Sankt Veit in Defereggental Access +9.4 pts and Terrain fit +3.6 pts

Access +9.4Terrain fit +3.6Snow now -2.7Snow reliability +1.1

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeSankt Veit in Defereggental

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIf terrain receives about 50% more weight, Sankt Veit in Defereggental becomes the leading option.

Lead margin11.5pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–2.

Evidence confidence75%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Why Gitschberg Jochtal leads Sankt Veit in Defereggental · 11.5 pts

Access+9.4 pts

Scale+3.1 pts

Terrain-2.8 pts

Current opportunity-2.7 pts

Family & value+1.8 pts

Lift system+1.5 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

Priority sensitivity · what can change the winner?

TerrainSankt Veit in Defereggental

If terrain receives about 50% more weight, Sankt Veit in Defereggental becomes the leading option.

Immediate conditionsSankt Veit in Defereggental

If immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, Sankt Veit in Defereggental becomes the stronger option.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Gitschberg Jochtal

#1 · Gitschberg Jochtal · Italy

Decision66/100

Fit66/100

Now0/100

Quality4.0/10

Now00 cm freshReliability5050/100Terrain7070/100Access7966 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit66.4100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision66.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow50/100 · 72% evidence 12.1 / 24.0 pts

Terrain69/100 · 80% evidence 15.2 / 22.0 pts

Scale85/100 · 85% evidence 13.6 / 16.0 pts

Lift system54/100 · 68% evidence 7.5 / 14.0 pts

Access79/100 · 68% evidence 9.4 / 12.0 pts

Family & value71/100 · 41% evidence 8.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 67/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area55 km · 1,203 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m30%Best transfer66 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Sankt Veit in Defereggental

#2 · Sankt Jakob im Defereggental · Austria

Decision55/100

Fit66/100

Now13/100

Quality9.2/10

Now1322 cm upperReliability5151/100Terrain7171/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit65.779% weight Now13.121% weight Decision54.9/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow51/100 · 52% evidence 13.8 / 27.3 pts

Terrain91/100 · 52% evidence 22.7 / 25.0 pts

Scale73/100 · 100% evidence 13.2 / 18.2 pts

Lift system48/100 · 68% evidence 7.6 / 15.9 pts

Family & value62/100 · 41% evidence 8.5 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 54%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow22 cm 2.8 / 37.5 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 20.0 pts

Valley snow43 cm 4.8 / 20.0 pts

Snow quality3.7/10 4.6 / 12.5 pts

Mid-mountain snow23 cm 1.0 / 10.0 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 80%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 73/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area24 km · 1,283 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is close to the available five-year level for this point in the season.

Strengths

Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 51/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	Gitschberg JochtalGitschberg Jochtal	Sankt Veit in DefereggentalSankt Jakob im Defereggental
Assessment
Decision score	66/100clear advantage	55/100
Structural Fit	66/100	66/100
Current opportunity	0/100	13/100clear advantage
Overall quality	4.0/10	9.2/10clear advantage
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	30/100	29/100
Typical daytime high	7°C	6°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-1°C	-1°C
Rating	6.1/10	6.6/10clear advantage
Area size class	50–100 km	20–50 km
Ability profile	advanced	expert
Price class	low	avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	55 kmclear advantage	24 km
Lowest point	1,307 m	1,400 m
Highest point	2,510 m	2,683 mclear advantage
Vertical range	1,203 m	1,283 m
Blue pistes	34%	21%
Red pistes	49%	53%
Black pistes	17%	26%clear advantage
Terrain above 2,000 m	30%	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	0%	–
Piste-mix diversity	92/100	93/100
Slope-angle diversity	49/100	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	2%	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	Close to typical+25% vs average · 73th percentile
Valley snow versus typical	–	Well above typical+466% vs average · 100th percentile
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	43 cm
Mid-mountain snow	–	23 cm
Mountain snow	–	22 cm
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	3.7/10
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	442 pph/km	484 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	0.31×	0.30×
Terrain per lift	3.9 km/lift	3.4 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	-1°C	0°C
Maximum temperature	6°C	7°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	family
Piste variety	–	–
Off-piste	–	–
Cross-country	–	crosscountry
Lift network	lifts	lifts
Mountain restaurants	restaurants	–
Après-ski	–	–
Public transport	transit	–
Best airport transfer	66 min	–
Skiing per transfer hour	50 km/h transfer	–

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Gitschberg Jochtal

Gitschberg Jochtal

Resort overview

Gitschberg Jochtal

Sankt Veit in Defereggental

Detailed comparison