Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Beckenried is the strongest match because of solid terrain match · 60/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, solid reliability match · 54/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Dallenwil is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Recommended

Beckenried

62/100

Why

Beckenried is the strongest match because of solid terrain match · 60/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, solid reliability match · 54/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Dallenwil is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 23 h ago

Structural fit score: 62/100.

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeDallenwil

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Beckenried

Access-led destinationLow-regret choice

Leads on solid terrain match · 60/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, solid reliability match · 54/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Beckenried leads Dallenwil Access +10.5 pts and Terrain fit +9.6 pts

Access +10.5Terrain fit +9.6Snow reliability +5.9Snow now -1.1

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeDallenwil

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

What could change the resultIncrease lift system weight from 14 to 80 and Dallenwil becomes the leading option.

Lead margin24.8pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence64%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

Lift systemDallenwil

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 80 and Dallenwil becomes the leading option.

14 → 80

Why Beckenried leads Dallenwil · 24.8 pts

Access+10.5 pts

Terrain+9.8 pts

Scale+8.5 pts

Lift system-6.2 pts

Snow+5.9 pts

Family & value-2.5 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Beckenried

#1 · Klewenalp Stockhutte · Switzerland

Decision62/100

Fit62/100

Now0/100

Quality4.2/10

Now00 cm freshReliability5454/100Terrain6060/100Access8857 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit61.8100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision61.8/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow54/100 · 37% evidence 13.1 / 24.0 pts

Terrain58/100 · 52% evidence 12.7 / 22.0 pts

Scale67/100 · 100% evidence 10.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts

Access88/100 · 68% evidence 10.5 / 12.0 pts

Family & value78/100 · 41% evidence 9.3 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAccess-led destinationBest useFamily trips · 66/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area40 km · 739 m verticalBest transfer57 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 60/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Solid reliability match · 54/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Dallenwil

#2 · Dallenwil Wirzweli · Switzerland

Decision37/100

Fit42/100

Now8/100

Quality4.0/10

Now830 cm upperReliability3131/100Terrain4646/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit41.586% weight Now8.114% weight Decision37.0/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow31/100 · 37% evidence 8.3 / 27.3 pts

Terrain13/100 · 39% evidence 3.3 / 25.0 pts

Scale15/100 · 100% evidence 2.6 / 18.2 pts

Lift system86/100 · 68% evidence 13.7 / 15.9 pts

Family & value100/100 · 18% evidence 13.6 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 45%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow30 cm 4.3 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow20 cm 2.5 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow26 cm 1.2 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 61/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area1 km · 135 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Mixed terrain match · 46/100 — led by strong lift-system evidence and strong terrain profile; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 31/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Buochs

#3 · · Switzerland

Decision–/100

Fit–/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

AccessNo data excluded

Family & valueNo data excluded

Lift systemNo data excluded

ScaleNo data excluded

SnowNo data excluded

TerrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeEvidence-limited destinationSnow reliabilityNot availableSki area– · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected date

Strengths

The destination remains scoreable, but there is not enough evidence for a strong archetype.

Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	BeckenriedKlewenalp Stockhutte	DallenwilDallenwil Wirzweli	BuochsSwitzerland
Assessment
Decision score	62/100clear advantage	37/100	–
Structural Fit	62/100clear advantage	42/100	–
Current opportunity	0/100	8/100clear advantage	–
Overall quality	4.2/10	4.0/10	–
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Low	Low
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	50/100clear advantage	25/100	–
Typical daytime high	6°C	4°C	–
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–	–
Typical overnight low	-1°C	-3°C	–
Rating	6.7/10	–	–
Area size class	20–50 km	20 km or less	–
Ability profile	advanced	novice	–
Price class	high	high	–
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	40 kmclear advantage	1 km	–
Lowest point	1,199 m	1,215 m	–
Highest point	1,938 mclear advantage	1,350 m	–
Vertical range	739 mclear advantage	135 m	–
Blue pistes	38%	100%	–
Red pistes	63%	0%	–
Black pistes	0%	0%	–
Terrain above 2,000 m	–	–	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	–	–	–
Piste-mix diversity	95/100	–	–
Slope-angle diversity	–	–	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	–	–	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	20 cm	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	26 cm	–
Mountain snow	–	30 cm	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm	–
Snow quality	–	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–	–
Open lifts	–	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	381 pph/km	1,500 pph/kmclear advantage	–
Lift-system coverage	0.28×	2.60×clear advantage	–
Terrain per lift	2.7 km/lift	0.3 km/lift	–
Weather
Minimum temperature	1°C	0°C	6°C
Maximum temperature	10°C	4°C	9°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	–	–
Piste variety	–	–	–
Off-piste	–	–	–
Cross-country	–	–	–
Lift network	–	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–	–
Après-ski	–	–	–
Public transport	transit	transit	–
Best airport transfer	57 min	–	–
Skiing per transfer hour	42 km/h transfer	–	–

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Beckenried

Beckenried

Resort overview

Beckenried

Dallenwil

Buochs

Detailed comparison