Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Radstadt is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Dorfgastein is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Recommended

Radstadt

71/100

Why

Radstadt is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Dorfgastein is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Limited evidenceUpdated 22 h ago

Structural fit score: 71/100.

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeDorfgastein

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Radstadt

Efficient short-break baseLow-regret choice

Leads on good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Radstadt leads Dorfgastein Terrain fit +10.3 pts and Access +2.4 pts

Terrain fit +10.3Snow now -3.7Access +2.4Snow reliability -0.9

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeDorfgastein

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIf immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, Dorfgastein becomes the stronger option.

Lead margin7.8pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence69%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Why Radstadt leads Dorfgastein · 7.8 pts

Lift system+6.3 pts

Current opportunity-3.7 pts

Access+2.4 pts

Family & value+2.0 pts

Scale+1.5 pts

Snow-0.9 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

Priority sensitivity · what can change the winner?

Immediate conditionsDorfgastein

If immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, Dorfgastein becomes the stronger option.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Radstadt

#1 · Zauchensee · Austria

Decision71/100

Fit71/100

Now0/100

Quality7.5/10

Now00 cm freshReliability5050/100Terrain7575/100Access9153 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit71.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision71.1/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow50/100 · 73% evidence 12.1 / 24.0 pts

Terrain58/100 · 80% evidence 12.7 / 22.0 pts

Scale83/100 · 100% evidence 13.3 / 16.0 pts

Lift system86/100 · 8% evidence 12.0 / 14.0 pts

Access91/100 · 68% evidence 11.0 / 12.0 pts

Family & value85/100 · 41% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 65%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeEfficient short-break baseBest useShort breaks · 76/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area45 km · 1,176 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer53 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Dorfgastein

#2 · Dorfgastein Grossarltal · Austria

Decision63/100

Fit69/100

Now27/100

Quality6.5/10

Now27100 cm upperReliability6262/100Terrain6969/100Access8363 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit69.086% weight Now27.414% weight Decision63.3/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow62/100 · 37% evidence 15.0 / 24.0 pts

Terrain64/100 · 52% evidence 14.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale86/100 · 100% evidence 13.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system47/100 · 68% evidence 6.6 / 14.0 pts

Access83/100 · 68% evidence 10.0 / 12.0 pts

Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow100 cm 14.3 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow70 cm 8.9 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow88 cm 4.2 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useFamily trips · 71/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area68 km · 1,184 m verticalBest transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Solid reliability match · 62/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	RadstadtZauchensee	DorfgasteinDorfgastein Grossarltal
Assessment
Decision score	71/100clear advantage	63/100
Structural Fit	71/100	69/100
Current opportunity	0/100	27/100clear advantage
Overall quality	7.5/10clear advantage	6.5/10
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	69/100	67/100
Typical daytime high	2°C	3°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-5°C	-5°C
Rating	6.4/10	6.8/10clear advantage
Area size class	20–50 km	50–100 km
Ability profile	intermediate	advanced
Price class	avg	avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	45 km	68 kmclear advantage
Lowest point	1,000 mclear advantage	849 m
Highest point	2,176 m	2,033 m
Vertical range	1,176 m	1,184 m
Blue pistes	52%	46%
Red pistes	38%	52%
Black pistes	10%clear advantage	2%
Terrain above 2,000 m	0%	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	0%	–
Piste-mix diversity	85/100clear advantage	71/100
Slope-angle diversity	15/100	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	1%	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	70 cm
Mid-mountain snow	–	88 cm
Mountain snow	–	100 cm
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	–	418 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	–	0.27×
Terrain per lift	2.8 km/lift	4.2 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	3°C	18°C
Maximum temperature	21°C	22°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	family
Piste variety	–	–
Off-piste	–	–
Cross-country	–	–
Lift network	–	lifts
Mountain restaurants	–	–
Après-ski	–	apresski
Public transport	transit	transit
Best airport transfer	53 min	63 min
Skiing per transfer hour	51 km/h transfer	64 km/h transfer

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Radstadt

Radstadt

Resort overview

Radstadt

Dorfgastein

Detailed comparison