Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Val di Sole is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Alta Badia is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Recommended

Val di Sole

79/100

Why

Val di Sole is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Alta Badia is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 23 h ago

Strong overall decision score (79/100).

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeAlta Badia

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Val di Sole

Lift-system performerLow-regret choice

Leads on strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Val di Sole leads Alta Badia Terrain fit +14.6 pts and Snow reliability +9.2 pts

Terrain fit +14.6Snow reliability +9.2Access -7.3Snow now -3.7

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeAlta Badia

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

What could change the resultIf immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, Alta Badia becomes the stronger option.

Lead margin12.8pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence47%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Why Val di Sole leads Alta Badia · 12.8 pts

Terrain+10.0 pts

Snow+9.2 pts

Access-7.3 pts

Lift system+4.0 pts

Current opportunity-3.7 pts

Scale+0.3 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

Priority sensitivity · what can change the winner?

Immediate conditionsAlta Badia

If immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, Alta Badia becomes the stronger option.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Val di Sole

#1 · Val di Sole · Italy

Decision79/100

Fit79/100

Now0/100

Quality7.8/10

Now00 cm freshReliability8080/100Terrain7979/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit79.4100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision79.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow80/100 · 37% evidence 21.8 / 27.3 pts

Terrain88/100 · 52% evidence 22.0 / 25.0 pts

Scale67/100 · 85% evidence 12.1 / 18.2 pts

Lift system87/100 · 8% evidence 13.9 / 15.9 pts

Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 40%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLift-system performerBest useAdvanced skiing · 81/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area16 km · 1,816 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Alta Badia

#2 · Alta Badia · Italy

Decision67/100

Fit73/100

Now27/100

Quality6.6/10

Now2781 cm upperReliability6161/100Terrain7878/100Access7192 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit72.886% weight Now26.914% weight Decision66.6/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow61/100 · 73% evidence 14.6 / 24.0 pts

Terrain63/100 · 80% evidence 13.9 / 22.0 pts

Scale86/100 · 100% evidence 13.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system82/100 · 68% evidence 11.5 / 14.0 pts

Access71/100 · 68% evidence 8.5 / 12.0 pts

Family & value89/100 · 41% evidence 10.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow81 cm 11.6 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow90 cm 11.4 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow81 cm 3.9 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useFamily trips · 77/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area130 km · 1,454 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m23%Best transfer92 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 46% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 78/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Solid reliability match · 61/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	Val di SoleVal di Sole	Alta BadiaAlta Badia
Assessment
Decision score	79/100clear advantage	67/100
Structural Fit	79/100clear advantage	73/100
Current opportunity	0/100	27/100clear advantage
Overall quality	7.8/10clear advantage	6.6/10
Recommendation confidence	Low	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	65/100clear advantage	46/100
Typical daytime high	4°C	3°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-3°C	-4°C
Rating	6.7/10	8.2/10clear advantage
Area size class	20 km or less	100–150 km
Ability profile	advanced	novice
Price class	avg	avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	16 km	130 kmclear advantage
Lowest point	1,200 m	1,324 m
Highest point	3,016 mclear advantage	2,778 m
Vertical range	1,816 mclear advantage	1,454 m
Blue pistes	29%	57%
Red pistes	49%	36%
Black pistes	22%clear advantage	7%
Terrain above 2,000 m	–	23%
Terrain above 3,000 m	–	0%
Piste-mix diversity	95/100clear advantage	79/100
Slope-angle diversity	–	28/100
Very/extremely steep terrain	–	3%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	Well below typical-46% vs average · 0th percentile
Valley snow versus typical	–	Above typical+18% vs average · 49th percentile
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	90 cm
Mid-mountain snow	–	81 cm
Mountain snow	–	81 cm
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	–	760 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	–	0.38×
Terrain per lift	0.9 km/lift	2.5 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	13°C	8°C
Maximum temperature	25°C	12°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	family
Piste variety	–	slopes
Off-piste	offpiste	–
Cross-country	–	–
Lift network	–	lifts
Mountain restaurants	–	restaurants
Après-ski	–	apresski
Public transport	–	transit
Best airport transfer	–	92 min
Skiing per transfer hour	–	85 km/h transfer

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Val di Sole

Val di Sole

Resort overview

Val di Sole

Alta Badia

Detailed comparison