Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Charmey is the strongest match because of solid terrain match · 53/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Broc is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Narrow lead

Charmey

53/100

Why

Charmey is the strongest match because of solid terrain match · 53/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Broc is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 15 h ago

Structural fit score: 53/100.

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeBroc

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Charmey

Family progression baseLow-regret choiceNarrow lead

Leads on solid terrain match · 53/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Charmey leads Broc Access +10.5 pts and Snow reliability +3.6 pts

Access +10.5Terrain fit -9.7Snow reliability +3.6

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBroc

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultReduce access weight from 12 to 0 and Broc becomes the leading option.

Lead margin4.3pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence77%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

AccessBroc

Reduce access weight from 12 to 0 and Broc becomes the leading option.

12 → 0

Lift systemBroc

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 26 and Broc becomes the leading option.

14 → 26

SnowBroc

Reduce snow weight from 24 to 11 and Broc becomes the leading option.

24 → 11

Family & valueBroc

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 32 and Broc becomes the leading option.

12 → 32

Why Charmey leads Broc · 4.3 pts

Access+10.5 pts

Terrain-6.9 pts

Family & value-5.1 pts

Snow+3.6 pts

Lift system+1.6 pts

Scale+0.7 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Charmey

#1 · Charmey · Switzerland

Decision53/100

Fit53/100

Now0/100

Quality3.0/10

Now00 cm freshReliability3737/100Terrain5353/100Access8755 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit53.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision53.0/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow37/100 · 73% evidence 8.8 / 24.0 pts

Terrain55/100 · 80% evidence 12.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale62/100 · 100% evidence 10.0 / 16.0 pts

Lift system11/100 · 68% evidence 1.6 / 14.0 pts

Access87/100 · 68% evidence 10.5 / 12.0 pts

Family & value84/100 · 41% evidence 10.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 59/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area30 km · 751 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer55 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 53/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Broc

#2 · Broc · Switzerland

Decision49/100

Fit49/100

Now0/100

Quality–/10

Now00 cm freshReliability1616/100Terrain6464/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit48.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision48.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow16/100 · 18% evidence 5.2 / 32.4 pts

Terrain64/100 · 28% evidence 19.0 / 29.7 pts

Scale43/100 · 58% evidence 9.3 / 21.6 pts

Family & value94/100 · 28% evidence 15.2 / 16.2 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Lift systemNo data excluded

Data coverage: 23%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseSnow reliabilityLowSki area11 km · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Unknown altitude

Strengths

Good terrain match · 64/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 16/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Chables

#3 · · Switzerland

Decision–/100

Fit–/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

AccessNo data excluded

Family & valueNo data excluded

Lift systemNo data excluded

ScaleNo data excluded

SnowNo data excluded

TerrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeEvidence-limited destinationSnow reliabilityNot availableSki area– · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected date

Strengths

The destination remains scoreable, but there is not enough evidence for a strong archetype.

Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	CharmeyCharmey	BrocBroc	ChablesSwitzerland
Assessment
Decision score	53/100clear advantage	49/100	–
Structural Fit	53/100clear advantage	49/100	–
Current opportunity	0/100	0/100	–
Overall quality	3.0/10	–	–
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Low	Low
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	31/100clear advantage	16/100	–
Typical daytime high	4°C	4°C	–
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–	–
Typical overnight low	-3°C	-4°C	–
Rating	6.6/10	–	–
Area size class	20–50 km	20 km or less	–
Ability profile	novice	advanced	–
Price class	high	avg	–
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	30 km	11 km	–
Lowest point	875 m	–	–
Highest point	1,626 m	–	–
Vertical range	751 m	–	–
Blue pistes	65%	45%	–
Red pistes	25%	55%	–
Black pistes	10%clear advantage	0%	–
Terrain above 2,000 m	0%	–	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	0%	–	–
Piste-mix diversity	78/100	99/100clear advantage	–
Slope-angle diversity	46/100	–	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	3%	–	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	–	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	–	–
Mountain snow	–	–	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm	–
Snow quality	–	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–	–
Open lifts	–	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	163 pph/km	–	–
Lift-system coverage	0.20×	–	–
Terrain per lift	6.0 km/lift	–	–
Weather
Minimum temperature	2°C	5°C	5°C
Maximum temperature	5°C	7°C	8°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	–	–
Piste variety	–	–	–
Off-piste	–	–	–
Cross-country	–	–	–
Lift network	lifts	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–	–
Après-ski	–	–	–
Public transport	transit	–	–
Best airport transfer	55 min	–	–
Skiing per transfer hour	33 km/h transfer	–	–

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Charmey

Charmey

Resort overview

Charmey

Broc

Chables

Detailed comparison