Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Presena Gletscher is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, exceptional reliability match · 97/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Bad Ischl is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Recommendation limited by evidence

Presena Gletscher

76/100

Why

Presena Gletscher is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, exceptional reliability match · 97/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Bad Ischl is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 24 h ago

Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (76/100).

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeBad Ischl

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Presena Gletscher

Lift-system performerLow-regret choiceLimited evidence

Leads on good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, exceptional reliability match · 97/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Presena Gletscher leads Bad Ischl Snow reliability +17.0 pts and Terrain fit +8.0 pts

Snow reliability +17.0Access -10.4Terrain fit +8.0

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBad Ischl

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

What could change the resultReduce snow weight from 24 to 0 and Bad Ischl becomes the leading option.

Lead margin14.6pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence44%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

SnowBad Ischl

Reduce snow weight from 24 to 0 and Bad Ischl becomes the leading option.

24 → 0

Why Presena Gletscher leads Bad Ischl · 14.6 pts

Snow+17.0 pts

Lift system+10.6 pts

Access-10.4 pts

Scale-1.1 pts

Terrain-1.0 pts

Family & value-0.5 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Presena Gletscher

#1 · Presena · Italy

Decision76/100

Fit76/100

Now0/100

Quality–/10

Now00 cm freshReliability9797/100Terrain6868/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.6100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision75.6/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow97/100 · 37% evidence 26.4 / 27.3 pts

Terrain60/100 · 44% evidence 15.0 / 25.0 pts

Scale70/100 · 85% evidence 12.7 / 18.2 pts

Lift system89/100 · 8% evidence 14.1 / 15.9 pts

Family & value54/100 · 28% evidence 7.4 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 37%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLift-system performerBest useSnow-first trips · 83/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area62 km · 415 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Exceptional reliability match · 97/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Bad Ischl

#2 · Salzkammergut · Austria

Decision61/100

Fit61/100

Now0/100

Quality4.5/10

Now00 cm freshReliability3939/100Terrain6464/100Access8758 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit61.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision61.0/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow39/100 · 73% evidence 9.4 / 24.0 pts

Terrain73/100 · 80% evidence 16.0 / 22.0 pts

Scale86/100 · 85% evidence 13.8 / 16.0 pts

Lift system25/100 · 8% evidence 3.5 / 14.0 pts

Access87/100 · 68% evidence 10.4 / 12.0 pts

Family & value66/100 · 28% evidence 7.9 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 61%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 64/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area67 km · 1,131 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer58 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 64/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 39/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	Presena GletscherPresena	Bad IschlSalzkammergut
Assessment
Decision score	76/100clear advantage	61/100
Structural Fit	76/100clear advantage	61/100
Current opportunity	0/100	0/100
Overall quality	–	4.5/10
Recommendation confidence	Low	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	100/100clear advantage	52/100
Typical daytime high	-6°Cclear advantage	5°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-14°Cclear advantage	-2°C
Rating	–	–
Area size class	50–100 km	50–100 km
Ability profile	advanced	advanced
Price class	–	avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	62 km	67 km
Lowest point	2,585 mclear advantage	469 m
Highest point	3,000 mclear advantage	1,600 m
Vertical range	415 m	1,131 mclear advantage
Blue pistes	19%	28%
Red pistes	65%	61%
Black pistes	16%clear advantage	10%
Terrain above 2,000 m	–	0%
Terrain above 3,000 m	–	0%
Piste-mix diversity	81/100	81/100
Slope-angle diversity	–	73/100
Very/extremely steep terrain	–	9%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	–
Mountain snow	–	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	–	–
Lift-system coverage	–	–
Terrain per lift	2.1 km/lift	13.4 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	7°C	7°C
Maximum temperature	16°C	15°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	–	–
Piste variety	–	–
Off-piste	–	–
Cross-country	–	–
Lift network	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–
Après-ski	–	–
Public transport	–	transit
Best airport transfer	–	58 min
Skiing per transfer hour	–	69 km/h transfer

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Presena Gletscher

Presena Gletscher

Resort overview

Presena Gletscher

Bad Ischl

Detailed comparison