Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Davos is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 74/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 69/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Bormio is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Effectively tied

Davos

65/100

Why

Davos is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 74/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 69/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Bormio is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Mixed evidenceUpdated 20 h ago

Solid upper-mountain snow base at 166 cm.

AlternativeBormio

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Davos

Large-domain explorerLow-regret choiceEffectively tied

Effectively tied with Bormio. good terrain match · 74/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 69/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Davos leads Bormio Snow now +4.5 pts and Access +4.2 pts

Snow now +4.5Access +4.2Terrain fit -3.2Snow reliability -2.3

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBormio

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultReduce access weight from 12 to 3 and Bormio becomes the leading option.

Lead margin3.2pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence75%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

AccessBormio

Reduce access weight from 12 to 3 and Bormio becomes the leading option.

12 → 3

Family & valueBormio

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 69 and Bormio becomes the leading option.

12 → 69

SnowBormio

Increase snow weight from 24 to 90 and Bormio becomes the leading option.

24 → 90

Lift systemBormio

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 92 and Bormio becomes the leading option.

14 → 92

Why Davos leads Bormio · 3.2 pts

Current opportunity+4.5 pts

Access+4.2 pts

Snow-2.3 pts

Terrain-1.6 pts

Lift system-1.2 pts

Family & value-1.2 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Davos

#1 · Davos Klosters Mountains · Switzerland

Decision65/100

Fit70/100

Now33/100

Quality9.2/10

Now33166 cm upperReliability6969/100Terrain7474/100Access57109 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit70.486% weight Now32.714% weight Decision65.3/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow69/100 · 73% evidence 16.6 / 24.0 pts

Terrain78/100 · 80% evidence 17.2 / 22.0 pts

Scale98/100 · 100% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system36/100 · 68% evidence 5.0 / 14.0 pts

Access57/100 · 68% evidence 6.8 / 12.0 pts

Family & value75/100 · 41% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow166 cm 23.7 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow29 cm 3.7 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow111 cm 5.3 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 74/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area214 km · 2,034 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m56%Best transfer109 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 74/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 69/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Bormio

#2 · Bormio · Italy

Decision62/100

Fit62/100

Now0/100

Quality–/10

Now00 cm freshReliability6969/100Terrain6969/100Access15170 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit62.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision62.1/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow69/100 · 73% evidence 16.6 / 24.0 pts

Terrain75/100 · 72% evidence 16.5 / 22.0 pts

Scale80/100 · 100% evidence 12.8 / 16.0 pts

Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.5 / 14.0 pts

Access15/100 · 68% evidence 1.7 / 12.0 pts

Family & value75/100 · 41% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 72%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 68/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area50 km · 1,817 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m65%Best transfer170 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 69/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	DavosDavos Klosters Mountains	BormioBormio
Assessment
Decision score	65/100	62/100
Structural Fit	70/100clear advantage	62/100
Current opportunity	33/100clear advantage	0/100
Overall quality	9.2/10	–
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	72/100clear advantage	55/100
Typical daytime high	1°C	1°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-6°C	-7°C
Rating	8.2/10clear advantage	7.3/10
Area size class	150–250 km	20–50 km
Ability profile	advanced	advanced
Price class	high	–
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	214 kmclear advantage	50 km
Lowest point	810 m	1,200 mclear advantage
Highest point	2,844 m	3,017 mclear advantage
Vertical range	2,034 mclear advantage	1,817 m
Blue pistes	31%	32%
Red pistes	52%	44%
Black pistes	17%	24%clear advantage
Terrain above 2,000 m	56%	65%
Terrain above 3,000 m	0%	0%
Piste-mix diversity	91/100	97/100
Slope-angle diversity	49/100	44/100
Very/extremely steep terrain	4%	2%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	29 cm	–
Mid-mountain snow	111 cm	–
Mountain snow	166 cm	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	286 pph/km	368 pph/kmclear advantage
Lift-system coverage	0.29×	0.25×
Terrain per lift	4.5 km/lift	4.2 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	7°C	4°C
Maximum temperature	15°C	13°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	–
Piste variety	–	–
Off-piste	offpiste	–
Cross-country	crosscountry	–
Lift network	–	–
Mountain restaurants	restaurants	–
Après-ski	apresski	–
Public transport	–	–
Best airport transfer	109 minclear advantage	170 min
Skiing per transfer hour	118 km/h transferclear advantage	18 km/h transfer

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Davos

Davos

Resort overview

Davos

Bormio

Detailed comparison