Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Hinterzarten is the strongest match because of solid terrain match · 64/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 30/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Bugnenets is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Recommendation limited by evidence

Hinterzarten

54/100

Why

Hinterzarten is the strongest match because of solid terrain match · 64/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 30/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Bugnenets is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 18 h ago

Structural fit score: 54/100.

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeBugnenets

Main uncertaintyLimited evidence is available. Missing enriched fields are omitted rather than scored as zero.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Hinterzarten

Family progression baseLow-regret choiceLimited evidence

Leads on solid terrain match · 64/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 30/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Hinterzarten leads Bugnenets Terrain fit +5.2 pts

Terrain fit +5.2Snow reliability -0.8

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBugnenets

Main uncertaintyLimited evidence is available. Missing enriched fields are omitted rather than scored as zero.

What could change the resultReduce scale weight from 16 to 1 and Bugnenets becomes the leading option.

Lead margin4.4pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence37%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

ScaleBugnenets

Reduce scale weight from 16 to 1 and Bugnenets becomes the leading option.

16 → 1

TerrainBugnenets

Increase terrain weight from 22 to 67 and Bugnenets becomes the leading option.

22 → 67

Why Hinterzarten leads Bugnenets · 4.4 pts

Scale+4.8 pts

Family & value+3.2 pts

Terrain-2.2 pts

Snow-0.8 pts

Lift system-0.6 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Hinterzarten

#1 · Hinterzarten · Germany

Decision54/100

Fit54/100

Now0/100

Quality–/10

Now00 cm freshReliability3030/100Terrain6464/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit54.3100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision54.3/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow30/100 · 36% evidence 8.2 / 27.3 pts

Terrain58/100 · 28% evidence 14.5 / 25.0 pts

Scale83/100 · 58% evidence 15.2 / 18.2 pts

Lift system19/100 · 8% evidence 3.0 / 15.9 pts

Family & value99/100 · 28% evidence 13.5 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 29%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useAdvanced skiing · 56/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area51 km · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 64/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 30/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Bugnenets

#2 · Bugnenets-Savagnieres · Switzerland

Decision50/100

Fit50/100

Now0/100

Quality4.8/10

Now00 cm freshReliability3333/100Terrain5656/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit49.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision49.9/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow33/100 · 37% evidence 9.0 / 27.3 pts

Terrain67/100 · 52% evidence 16.7 / 25.0 pts

Scale57/100 · 85% evidence 10.4 / 18.2 pts

Lift system22/100 · 68% evidence 3.6 / 15.9 pts

Family & value75/100 · 41% evidence 10.3 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 48%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationBest useAdvanced skiing · 54/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area30 km · 371 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 56/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 33/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	HinterzartenHinterzarten	BugnenetsBugnenets-Savagnieres
Assessment
Decision score	54/100clear advantage	50/100
Structural Fit	54/100clear advantage	50/100
Current opportunity	0/100	0/100
Overall quality	–	4.8/10
Recommendation confidence	Low	Low
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	35/100	29/100
Typical daytime high	2°C	2°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-2°C	-4°C
Rating	–	6.8/10
Area size class	50–100 km	20–50 km
Ability profile	novice	expert
Price class	low	high
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	51 kmclear advantage	30 km
Lowest point	–	1,078 m
Highest point	1,200 m	1,449 mclear advantage
Vertical range	–	371 m
Blue pistes	60%	33%
Red pistes	40%	33%
Black pistes	0%	33%clear advantage
Terrain above 2,000 m	–	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	–	–
Piste-mix diversity	97/100	100/100
Slope-angle diversity	–	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	–	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	–
Mountain snow	–	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	–	252 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	–	0.24×
Terrain per lift	12.8 km/lift	3.8 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	9°C	10°C
Maximum temperature	17°C	16°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	–	family
Piste variety	–	–
Off-piste	–	–
Cross-country	–	–
Lift network	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–
Après-ski	–	–
Public transport	–	–
Best airport transfer	–	–
Skiing per transfer hour	–	–

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Hinterzarten

Hinterzarten

Resort overview

Hinterzarten

Bugnenets

Detailed comparison