Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected7 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

7 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Breuil Cervinia is the strongest alternative. 4 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Recommended

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Breuil Cervinia is the strongest alternative. 4 options remain on the Pareto frontier.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 11 h ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 145 cm.
AlternativeBreuil Cervinia
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 11 h ago10.8 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choice

Leads on strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Chamonix leads Breuil Cervinia Terrain fit +11.8 pts and Access +3.1 pts
Terrain fit +11.8Access +3.1Snow reliability -3.0Snow now -0.9
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBreuil Cervinia

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultThe recommendation remains first under the tested nearby priority shifts in the available evidence.

Lead margin10.8pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier4 options

3 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Why Chamonix leads Breuil Cervinia · 10.8 pts
Lift system+4.9 pts
Terrain+3.6 pts
Access+3.1 pts
Snow-3.0 pts
Family & value+2.2 pts
Scale+1.1 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

Priority sensitivity

The leading resort remains first under moderate one-criterion weighting shifts in the available evidence.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 146% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Breuil Cervinia

#2 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit75/100
Now23/100
Quality9.2/10
Now2380 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now22.622% weight Decision63.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow80 cm 8.0 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow56 cm 1.9 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 36% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#3 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Risoul

#4 · La Foret Blanche · France

Decision63/100
Fit63/100
Now0/100
Quality7.4/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7373/100Terrain6565/100Access34148 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit62.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision62.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow73/100 · 73% evidence 17.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain68/100 · 80% evidence 15.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale84/100 · 100% evidence 13.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system22/100 · 68% evidence 3.1 / 14.0 pts
Access34/100 · 68% evidence 4.1 / 12.0 pts
Family & value81/100 · 41% evidence 9.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useSnow-first trips · 66/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area185 km · 1,100 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m82%Best transfer148 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 65/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 73/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Pitztal

#5 · Piztal · Austria

Decision63/100
Fit78/100
Now9/100
Quality7.8/10
Now925 cm upperReliability9292/100Terrain7171/100Access8254 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit77.578% weight Now9.122% weight Decision62.6/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow92/100 · 73% evidence 22.0 / 24.0 pts
Terrain78/100 · 80% evidence 17.1 / 22.0 pts
Scale58/100 · 85% evidence 9.3 / 16.0 pts
Lift system80/100 · 8% evidence 11.2 / 14.0 pts
Access82/100 · 68% evidence 9.8 / 12.0 pts
Family & value67/100 · 41% evidence 8.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow25 cm 2.5 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain5% 1.0 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow9 cm 0.8 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality4.2/10 4.2 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow19 cm 0.6 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 82/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area15 km · 1,000 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m95%Best transfer54 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 58% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 92/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Scale trails the selected-set median by 26 points.

Les Orres

#6 · Les Orres · France

Decision59/100
Fit59/100
Now0/100
Quality7.8/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7070/100Terrain6060/100Access29154 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit58.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision58.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow70/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain67/100 · 80% evidence 14.7 / 22.0 pts
Scale82/100 · 100% evidence 13.1 / 16.0 pts
Lift system16/100 · 68% evidence 2.2 / 14.0 pts
Access29/100 · 68% evidence 3.5 / 12.0 pts
Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 8.4 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 63/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area100 km · 1,170 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m61%Best transfer154 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 60/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 70/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

San Vito di Cadore

#7 · San Vito di Cadore Veneto · Italy

Decision46/100
Fit46/100
Now0/100
Quality5.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3838/100Terrain5555/100Access16159 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit45.8100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision45.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow38/100 · 73% evidence 9.0 / 24.0 pts
Terrain52/100 · 80% evidence 11.5 / 22.0 pts
Scale41/100 · 100% evidence 6.6 / 16.0 pts
Lift system55/100 · 68% evidence 7.8 / 14.0 pts
Access16/100 · 68% evidence 1.9 / 12.0 pts
Family & value75/100 · 41% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationBest useFamily trips · 50/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area10 km · 536 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer159 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 55/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 38/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalRisoulLa Foret BlanchePitztalPiztalLes OrresLes OrresSan Vito di CadoreSan Vito di Cadore Veneto
Assessment
Decision score 75/100clear advantage64/10064/10063/10063/10059/10046/100
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage75/10064/10063/10078/10059/10046/100
Current opportunity 29/100clear advantage23/1000/1000/1009/1000/1000/100
Overall quality 6.0/109.2/10clear advantage8.7/107.4/107.8/107.8/105.0/10
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10076/10078/10072/10087/100clear advantage71/10039/100
Typical daytime high 3°C-2°Cclear advantage1°C3°C1°C3°C3°C
Typical snow/freezing level –––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-7°C-6°C-5°C-5°C-5°C-5°C
Rating 8.1/108.1/107.4/107.6/107.2/107.4/106.0/10
Area size class 150–250 km250+ km100–150 km150–250 km20 km or less50–100 km20 km or less
Ability profile advancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvanced
Price class highhighhighlowavgavgavg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km322 kmclear advantage142 km185 km15 km100 km10 km
Lowest point 1,000 m1,562 m1,472 m1,650 m1,450 m1,550 m1,048 m
Highest point 3,842 m3,899 m3,573 m2,750 m2,450 m2,720 m1,584 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage2,337 m2,101 m1,100 m1,000 m1,170 m536 m
Blue pistes 34%23%22%41%26%30%40%
Red pistes 44%68%62%49%58%60%50%
Black pistes 22%clear advantage8%16%11%16%10%10%
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%92%57%82%95%61%0%
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%21%0%0%40%clear advantage0%0%
Piste-mix diversity 97/100clear advantage74/10084/10087/10088/10082/10086/100
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage51/10068/10043/10067/10055/10021/100
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage6%2%4%10%2%2%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience –––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth –––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth –––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth –––––––
Snow consistency –––––––
Late-winter retention –––––––
Lower-mountain retention –––––––
Warm-winter resilience –––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+146% vs average · 100th percentileWell below typical-36% vs average · 4th percentile––Below typical-58% vs average · 21th percentile––
Valley snow versus typical –Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile––Close to typical-42% vs average · 55th percentile––
Open slopes versus typical –Close to typical-20% vs average · 50th percentile––Well below typical-80% vs average · 0th percentile––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm19 cm––9 cm––
Mid-mountain snow 99 cmclear advantage56 cm––19 cm––
Mountain snow 145 cmclear advantage80 cm––25 cm––
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality –9.6/10clear advantage––4.2/10––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes –7%––5%––
Open lifts –––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km298 pph/km289 pph/km284 pph/km–228 pph/km688 pph/kmclear advantage
Lift-system coverage 0.48×clear advantage0.28×0.28×0.22×–0.14×0.28×
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift5.4 km/lift1.2 km/lift5.9 km/lift2.0 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 5°C-7°C2°C4°C5°C4°C4°C
Maximum temperature 12°C-4°C7°C12°C11°C13°C13°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability ––family––family–
Piste variety slopesslopesslopes––slopes–
Off-piste offpisteoffpiste–––––
Cross-country –––––––
Lift network –liftslifts––––
Mountain restaurants –restaurantsrestaurants––––
Après-ski –apresskiapresski––––
Public transport transittransit––transit––
Best airport transfer 63 min104 min441 min148 min54 min154 min159 min
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer75 km/h transfer17 km/h transfer39 km/h transfer4 km/h transfer