Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected8 of 10

ProfileBalanced

ModeStructural

Decision horizon

Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Kaunertal is the strongest alternative. 4 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Narrow lead

Chamonix

82/100

Why

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Kaunertal is the strongest alternative. 4 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 2 options have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 8 min ago

Strong overall decision score (82/100).

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeKaunertal

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Open webcams Show on map Inspect forecast

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choiceNarrow lead

Leads on strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Chamonix leads Kaunertal Terrain fit +10.6 pts and Access +1.1 pts

Terrain fit +10.6Snow reliability -6.0Access +1.1

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeKaunertal

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIncrease snow weight from 24 to 47 and Kaunertal becomes the leading option.

Lead margin5.5pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence75%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier4 options

4 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

SnowKaunertal

Increase snow weight from 24 to 47 and Kaunertal becomes the leading option.

24 → 47

AccessKuhtai

Increase access weight from 12 to 93 and Kuhtai becomes the leading option.

12 → 93

Why Chamonix leads Kaunertal · 5.5 pts

Snow-6.0 pts

Lift system+5.6 pts

Scale+3.8 pts

Terrain+1.3 pts

Access+1.1 pts

Family & value-0.1 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision82/100

Fit82/100

Now–/100

Quality6.0/10

Reliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.9100% weight Now–0% weight Decision81.9/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts

Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts

Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts

Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Kaunertal

#2 · Kaunertal · Austria

Decision76/100

Fit76/100

Now–/100

Quality10.0/10

Reliability9696/100Terrain6969/100Access7669 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit76.4100% weight Now–0% weight Decision76.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow96/100 · 37% evidence 22.9 / 24.0 pts

Terrain80/100 · 52% evidence 17.7 / 22.0 pts

Scale75/100 · 100% evidence 11.9 / 16.0 pts

Lift system37/100 · 8% evidence 5.1 / 14.0 pts

Access76/100 · 68% evidence 9.1 / 12.0 pts

Family & value80/100 · 41% evidence 9.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 51%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useSnow-first trips · 82/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area55 km · 963 m verticalBest transfer69 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Exceptional reliability match · 96/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Breuil Cervinia

#3 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision75/100

Fit75/100

Now–/100

Quality9.2/10

Reliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.4100% weight Now–0% weight Decision75.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts

Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts

Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts

Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts

Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts

Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Kuhtai

#4 · Kuhtai · Austria

Decision73/100

Fit73/100

Now–/100

Quality9.0/10

Reliability8686/100Terrain6363/100Access9745 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit72.5100% weight Now–0% weight Decision72.5/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow86/100 · 37% evidence 20.5 / 24.0 pts

Terrain79/100 · 52% evidence 17.3 / 22.0 pts

Scale73/100 · 100% evidence 11.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system35/100 · 68% evidence 4.9 / 14.0 pts

Access97/100 · 68% evidence 11.6 / 12.0 pts

Family & value54/100 · 41% evidence 6.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useSnow-first trips · 76/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area50 km · 582 m verticalBest transfer45 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 63/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Strong reliability match · 86/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Gitschberg Jochtal

#5 · Gitschberg Jochtal · Italy

Decision68/100

Fit68/100

Now–/100

Quality4.0/10

Reliability5959/100Terrain7070/100Access7966 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit68.4100% weight Now–0% weight Decision68.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow59/100 · 73% evidence 14.1 / 24.0 pts

Terrain69/100 · 80% evidence 15.2 / 22.0 pts

Scale85/100 · 85% evidence 13.6 / 16.0 pts

Lift system54/100 · 68% evidence 7.5 / 14.0 pts

Access79/100 · 68% evidence 9.4 / 12.0 pts

Family & value71/100 · 41% evidence 8.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 69/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area55 km · 1,203 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m30%Best transfer66 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Solid reliability match · 59/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Snow trails the selected-set median by 14 points.

Vallorcine

#6 · Balme Vallorcine · France

Decision66/100

Fit66/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Reliability6363/100Terrain6767/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit65.6100% weight Now–0% weight Decision65.6/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow63/100 · 37% evidence 17.2 / 27.3 pts

Terrain63/100 · 44% evidence 15.8 / 25.0 pts

Scale66/100 · 85% evidence 12.1 / 18.2 pts

Lift system63/100 · 68% evidence 10.0 / 15.9 pts

Family & value78/100 · 41% evidence 10.6 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 47%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationBest useFamily trips · 69/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area29 km · 797 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 67/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Solid reliability match · 63/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Scale trails the selected-set median by 16 points.

Saas

#7 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100

Fit64/100

Now–/100

Quality8.7/10

Reliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now–0% weight Decision63.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts

Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts

Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts

Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts

Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Bormio

#8 · Bormio · Italy

Decision62/100

Fit62/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Reliability6969/100Terrain6969/100Access15170 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit62.1100% weight Now–0% weight Decision62.1/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow69/100 · 73% evidence 16.6 / 24.0 pts

Terrain75/100 · 72% evidence 16.5 / 22.0 pts

Scale80/100 · 100% evidence 12.8 / 16.0 pts

Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.5 / 14.0 pts

Access15/100 · 68% evidence 1.7 / 12.0 pts

Family & value75/100 · 41% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 72%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 68/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area50 km · 1,817 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m65%Best transfer170 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 69/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	ChamonixChamonix Valley	KaunertalKaunertal	Breuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski Paradise	KuhtaiKuhtai	Gitschberg JochtalGitschberg Jochtal	VallorcineBalme Vallorcine	SaasSaastal	BormioBormio
Assessment
Decision score	82/100clear advantage	76/100	75/100	73/100	68/100	66/100	64/100	62/100
Structural Fit	82/100clear advantage	76/100	75/100	73/100	68/100	66/100	64/100	62/100
Current opportunity	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Overall quality	6.0/10	10.0/10clear advantage	9.2/10	9.0/10	4.0/10	–	8.7/10	–
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Low	Medium	Medium	Medium	Low	Medium	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	68/100	95/100	76/100	87/100	37/100	51/100	78/100	55/100
Typical daytime high	3°C	-1°C	-2°C	-4°C	3°C	10°C	1°C	1°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical overnight low	-4°C	-8°C	-7°C	-10°Cclear advantage	-5°C	5°C	-6°C	-7°C
Rating	8.1/10	6.7/10	8.1/10	6.8/10	6.1/10	4.4/10	7.4/10	7.3/10
Area size class	150–250 km	50–100 km	250+ km	20–50 km	50–100 km	20–50 km	100–150 km	20–50 km
Ability profile	advanced	intermediate	advanced	expert	advanced	advanced	advanced	advanced
Price class	high	avg	high	avg	low	–	high	–
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	175 km	55 km	322 kmclear advantage	50 km	55 km	29 km	142 km	50 km
Lowest point	1,000 m	2,150 mclear advantage	1,562 m	1,938 m	1,307 m	1,453 m	1,472 m	1,200 m
Highest point	3,842 m	3,113 m	3,899 m	2,520 m	2,510 m	2,250 m	3,573 m	3,017 m
Vertical range	2,842 mclear advantage	963 m	2,337 m	582 m	1,203 m	797 m	2,101 m	1,817 m
Blue pistes	34%	41%	23%	13%	34%	45%	22%	32%
Red pistes	44%	41%	68%	56%	49%	55%	62%	44%
Black pistes	22%	18%	8%	31%clear advantage	17%	0%	16%	24%
Terrain above 2,000 m	55%	–	92%clear advantage	–	30%	–	57%	65%
Terrain above 3,000 m	0%	–	21%clear advantage	–	0%	–	0%	0%
Piste-mix diversity	97/100	95/100	74/100	86/100	92/100	99/100	84/100	97/100
Slope-angle diversity	86/100clear advantage	–	51/100	–	49/100	–	68/100	44/100
Very/extremely steep terrain	21%clear advantage	–	6%	–	2%	–	2%	2%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mountain snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Fresh snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Snow quality	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Open lifts	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	556 pph/km	–	298 pph/km	391 pph/km	442 pph/km	548 pph/km	289 pph/km	368 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	0.48×	–	0.28×	0.22×	0.31×	0.43×	0.28×	0.25×
Terrain per lift	2.5 km/lift	7.9 km/lift	6.3 km/lift	4.2 km/lift	3.9 km/lift	2.2 km/lift	3.6 km/lift	4.2 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	3°C	-1°C	0°C	-2°C	-2°C	4°C	1°C	0°C
Maximum temperature	10°C	7°C	6°C	4°C	8°C	12°C	7°C	9°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	–	–	–	family	family	–	family	–
Piste variety	slopes	–	slopes	–	–	–	slopes	–
Off-piste	offpiste	–	offpiste	–	–	–	–	–
Cross-country	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lift network	–	–	lifts	lifts	lifts	–	lifts	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–	restaurants	restaurants	restaurants	–	restaurants	–
Après-ski	–	–	apresski	–	–	–	apresski	–
Public transport	transit	transit	transit	transit	transit	–	–	–
Best airport transfer	63 min	69 min	104 min	45 min	66 min	–	441 min	170 min
Skiing per transfer hour	166 km/h transfer	48 km/h transfer	186 km/h transfer	66 km/h transfer	50 km/h transfer	–	19 km/h transfer	18 km/h transfer

Compare ski resorts

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Chamonix

Chamonix

Resort overview

Chamonix

Kaunertal

Breuil Cervinia

Kuhtai

Gitschberg Jochtal

Vallorcine

Saas

Bormio

Detailed comparison