Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected8 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

8 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Klausberg is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Effectively tied

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Klausberg is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 11 h ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 145 cm.
AlternativeKlausberg
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Klausberg is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 11 h ago2.0 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choiceEffectively tied

Effectively tied with Klausberg. strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.

Why Chamonix leads Klausberg Access +8.8 pts and Snow now +4.0 pts
Access +8.8Terrain fit -7.0Snow now +4.0Snow reliability -3.8
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeKlausberg

Main uncertaintyThe lead over Klausberg is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultReduce lift system weight from 14 to 8 and Klausberg becomes the leading option.

Lead margin2.0pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier5 options

3 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

Lift systemKlausberg

Reduce lift system weight from 14 to 8 and Klausberg becomes the leading option.

14 → 8
Family & valueKlausberg

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 25 and Klausberg becomes the leading option.

12 → 25
ScaleKlausberg

Increase scale weight from 16 to 54 and Klausberg becomes the leading option.

16 → 54
Why Chamonix leads Klausberg · 2.0 pts
Access+8.8 pts
Current opportunity+4.0 pts
Snow-3.8 pts
Family & value-3.6 pts
Scale-3.2 pts
Terrain-3.0 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 146% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Klausberg

#2 · Ahrntal · Italy

Decision73/100
Fit73/100
Now0/100
Quality7.8/10
Now00 cm freshReliability6767/100Terrain7575/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit72.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision72.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow67/100 · 73% evidence 18.4 / 27.3 pts
Terrain78/100 · 80% evidence 19.4 / 25.0 pts
Scale92/100 · 85% evidence 16.7 / 18.2 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 6.4 / 15.9 pts
Family & value87/100 · 41% evidence 11.8 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 75/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area87 km · 1,560 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m34%Current dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 67/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Grimentz

#3 · Grimentz Zinal · Switzerland

Decision67/100
Fit67/100
Now0/100
Quality9.1/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7373/100Terrain6868/100Access45132 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit66.6100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision66.6/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow73/100 · 73% evidence 17.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain88/100 · 80% evidence 19.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale84/100 · 100% evidence 13.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system19/100 · 68% evidence 2.7 / 14.0 pts
Access45/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 12.0 pts
Family & value68/100 · 41% evidence 8.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 74/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area115 km · 1,330 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m82%Best transfer132 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 73/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Le Seignus

#4 · Espace Lumiere · France

Decision66/100
Fit66/100
Now0/100
Quality8.2/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7272/100Terrain6363/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit65.5100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision65.5/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow72/100 · 73% evidence 19.5 / 27.3 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 18.8 / 25.0 pts
Scale82/100 · 100% evidence 14.9 / 18.2 pts
Lift system17/100 · 68% evidence 2.6 / 15.9 pts
Family & value71/100 · 41% evidence 9.7 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 66%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 69/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area180 km · 968 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m69%Current dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 63/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 72/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Breuil Cervinia

#5 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit75/100
Now23/100
Quality9.2/10
Now2380 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now22.622% weight Decision63.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow80 cm 8.0 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow56 cm 1.9 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 36% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#6 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Flachau

#7 · Snow Space Salzburg · Austria

Decision59/100
Fit68/100
Now1/100
Quality6.0/10
Now15 cm upperReliability4848/100Terrain7272/100Access8567 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit67.786% weight Now0.914% weight Decision58.5/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow48/100 · 73% evidence 11.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain57/100 · 80% evidence 12.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale92/100 · 100% evidence 14.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system80/100 · 68% evidence 11.1 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow5 cm 0.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow3 cm 0.1 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeEfficient short-break baseBest useShort breaks · 71/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area120 km · 1,240 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer67 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top <2,000 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 83% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 72/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 48/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Seythenex la Sambuy

#8 · La Sambuy · France

Decision58/100
Fit58/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5050/100Terrain6060/100Access6868 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit58.2100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision58.2/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow50/100 · 73% evidence 11.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain77/100 · 72% evidence 17.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale44/100 · 100% evidence 7.1 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access68/100 · 68% evidence 8.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value71/100 · 41% evidence 8.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 72%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 62/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area10 km · 701 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m7%Best transfer68 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 60/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 50/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

The ski area is comparatively compact.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyKlausbergAhrntalGrimentzGrimentz ZinalLe SeignusEspace LumiereBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalFlachauSnow Space SalzburgSeythenex la SambuyLa Sambuy
Assessment
Decision score 75/10073/10067/10066/10064/10064/10059/10058/100
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage73/10067/10066/10075/10064/10068/10058/100
Current opportunity 29/100clear advantage0/1000/1000/10023/1000/1001/1000/100
Overall quality 6.0/107.8/109.1/108.2/109.2/108.7/106.0/10–
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10087/100clear advantage67/10075/10076/10078/10070/10049/100
Typical daytime high 3°C1°C0°C3°C-2°Cclear advantage1°C4°C6°C
Typical snow/freezing level ––––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-6°C-6°C-4°C-7°C-6°C-3°C-1°C
Rating 8.1/106.6/107.8/106.7/108.1/107.4/107.3/106.4/10
Area size class 150–250 km50–100 km100–150 km150–250 km250+ km100–150 km100–150 km20 km or less
Ability profile advancedintermediateexpertadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedexpert
Price class highlowhighlowhighhighavglow
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km87 km115 km180 km322 kmclear advantage142 km120 km10 km
Lowest point 1,000 m950 m1,570 m1,608 m1,562 m1,472 m740 m1,150 m
Highest point 3,842 m2,510 m2,900 m2,576 m3,899 m3,573 m1,980 m1,851 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage1,560 m1,330 m968 m2,337 m2,101 m1,240 m701 m
Blue pistes 34%51%23%31%23%22%28%30%
Red pistes 44%34%51%52%68%62%68%30%
Black pistes 22%14%26%17%8%16%3%40%clear advantage
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%34%82%69%92%57%0%7%
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%0%0%0%21%clear advantage0%0%0%
Piste-mix diversity 97/10090/10094/10091/10074/10084/10067/10099/100
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage70/10073/10058/10051/10068/10034/10072/100
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage8%11%5%6%2%1%9%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience ––––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth ––––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth ––––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth ––––––––
Snow consistency ––––––––
Late-winter retention ––––––––
Lower-mountain retention ––––––––
Warm-winter resilience ––––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+146% vs average · 100th percentile–––Well below typical-36% vs average · 4th percentile–Well below typical-83% vs average · 4th percentile–
Valley snow versus typical ––––Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile–––
Open slopes versus typical ––––Close to typical-20% vs average · 50th percentile–––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm–––19 cm–0 cm–
Mid-mountain snow 99 cmclear advantage–––56 cm–3 cm–
Mountain snow 145 cmclear advantage–––80 cm–5 cm–
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality ––––9.6/10–––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes ––––7%–––
Open lifts ––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km430 pph/km210 pph/km252 pph/km298 pph/km289 pph/km687 pph/kmclear advantage365 pph/km
Lift-system coverage 0.48×0.19×0.20×0.19×0.28×0.28×0.40×0.36×
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift3.9 km/lift5.5 km/lift5.0 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift2.7 km/lift2.0 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 5°C5°C4°C6°C-7°C2°C4°C6°C
Maximum temperature 12°C11°C9°C14°C-4°C7°C12°C11°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability ––family––familyfamily–
Piste variety slopes–slopes–slopesslopesslopes–
Off-piste offpiste–offpisteoffpisteoffpiste–––
Cross-country ––––––crosscountry–
Lift network ––––liftsliftslifts–
Mountain restaurants ––––restaurantsrestaurantsrestaurants–
Après-ski ––––apresskiapresskiapresski–
Public transport transit–––transit–transittransit
Best airport transfer 63 min–132 min–104 min441 min67 min68 min
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer–52 km/h transfer–186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer107 km/h transfer9 km/h transfer