Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected9 of 10

ProfileBalanced

ModeStructural

Decision horizon

Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Val di Sole is the strongest alternative. 6 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Effectively tied

Chamonix

82/100

Why

Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Val di Sole is the strongest alternative. 6 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 11 min ago

Strong overall decision score (82/100).

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeVal di Sole

Main uncertaintyThe lead over Val di Sole is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Open webcams Show on map Inspect forecast

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choiceEffectively tied

Effectively tied with Val di Sole. strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.

Why Chamonix leads Val di Sole Access +10.2 pts

Access +10.2Snow reliability -4.9Terrain fit -2.6

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeVal di Sole

Main uncertaintyThe lead over Val di Sole is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultReduce scale weight from 16 to 8 and Val di Sole becomes the leading option.

Lead margin2.5pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence75%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier6 options

3 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

ScaleVal di Sole

Reduce scale weight from 16 to 8 and Val di Sole becomes the leading option.

16 → 8

Lift systemVal di Sole

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 35 and Val di Sole becomes the leading option.

14 → 35

SnowVal di Sole

Increase snow weight from 24 to 51 and Val di Sole becomes the leading option.

24 → 51

Why Chamonix leads Val di Sole · 2.5 pts

Access+10.2 pts

Snow-4.9 pts

Scale+3.6 pts

Lift system-3.2 pts

Terrain-3.0 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision82/100

Fit82/100

Now–/100

Quality6.0/10

Reliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.9100% weight Now–0% weight Decision81.9/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts

Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts

Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts

Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Val di Sole

#2 · Val di Sole · Italy

Decision79/100

Fit79/100

Now–/100

Quality7.8/10

Reliability8080/100Terrain7979/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit79.4100% weight Now–0% weight Decision79.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow80/100 · 37% evidence 21.8 / 27.3 pts

Terrain88/100 · 52% evidence 22.0 / 25.0 pts

Scale67/100 · 85% evidence 12.1 / 18.2 pts

Lift system87/100 · 8% evidence 13.9 / 15.9 pts

Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 40%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeLift-system performerBest useAdvanced skiing · 81/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area16 km · 1,816 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Breuil Cervinia

#3 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision75/100

Fit75/100

Now–/100

Quality9.2/10

Reliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.4100% weight Now–0% weight Decision75.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts

Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts

Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts

Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts

Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts

Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Gaschurn

#4 · Silvretta Montafon · Austria

Decision75/100

Fit75/100

Now–/100

Quality5.8/10

Reliability6262/100Terrain7979/100Access7388 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit74.5100% weight Now–0% weight Decision74.5/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow62/100 · 73% evidence 14.9 / 24.0 pts

Terrain78/100 · 80% evidence 17.2 / 22.0 pts

Scale96/100 · 100% evidence 15.4 / 16.0 pts

Lift system59/100 · 68% evidence 8.2 / 14.0 pts

Access73/100 · 68% evidence 8.8 / 12.0 pts

Family & value83/100 · 41% evidence 9.9 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 76/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area142 km · 1,730 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m32%Best transfer88 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Solid reliability match · 62/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Snow trails the selected-set median by 12 points.

Saas

#5 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100

Fit64/100

Now–/100

Quality8.7/10

Reliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now–0% weight Decision63.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts

Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts

Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts

Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts

Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Stelvio Pass

#6 · Passo dello Stelvio · Italy

Decision60/100

Fit60/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Reliability9090/100Terrain5454/100Access29134 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit59.6100% weight Now–0% weight Decision59.6/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow90/100 · 37% evidence 21.5 / 24.0 pts

Terrain37/100 · 44% evidence 8.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale49/100 · 100% evidence 7.8 / 16.0 pts

Lift system67/100 · 68% evidence 9.3 / 14.0 pts

Access29/100 · 68% evidence 3.5 / 12.0 pts

Family & value78/100 · 41% evidence 9.3 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 57%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeSnow-reliability specialistBest useSnow-first trips · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area9 km · 690 m verticalBest transfer134 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 54/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Exceptional reliability match · 90/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Vals 3000

#7 · Vals · Switzerland

Decision57/100

Fit57/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Reliability6262/100Terrain5555/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit56.7100% weight Now–0% weight Decision56.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow62/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 27.3 pts

Terrain75/100 · 72% evidence 18.8 / 25.0 pts

Scale69/100 · 100% evidence 12.5 / 18.2 pts

Lift system6/100 · 68% evidence 0.9 / 15.9 pts

Family & value56/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 64%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 62/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area25 km · 1,565 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m30%Current dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 55/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Solid reliability match · 62/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Champex

#8 · Champex · Switzerland

Decision56/100

Fit56/100

Now–/100

Quality9.0/10

Reliability7575/100Terrain5050/100Access48106 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit56.1100% weight Now–0% weight Decision56.1/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow75/100 · 37% evidence 18.0 / 24.0 pts

Terrain60/100 · 52% evidence 13.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale51/100 · 100% evidence 8.1 / 16.0 pts

Lift system9/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 14.0 pts

Access48/100 · 68% evidence 5.8 / 12.0 pts

Family & value82/100 · 41% evidence 9.8 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useSnow-first trips · 62/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area15 km · 726 m verticalBest transfer106 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Mixed terrain match · 50/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Good reliability match · 75/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Habkern

#9 · Habkern · Switzerland

Decision39/100

Fit39/100

Now–/100

Quality–/10

Reliability3737/100Terrain4040/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit39.4100% weight Now–0% weight Decision39.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow37/100 · 73% evidence 10.1 / 27.3 pts

Terrain51/100 · 72% evidence 12.7 / 25.0 pts

Scale35/100 · 100% evidence 6.4 / 18.2 pts

Lift system12/100 · 68% evidence 1.9 / 15.9 pts

Family & value61/100 · 41% evidence 8.3 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 64%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationBest useFamily trips · 43/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area8 km · 385 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Current dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Mixed terrain match · 40/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	ChamonixChamonix Valley	Val di SoleVal di Sole	Breuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski Paradise	GaschurnSilvretta Montafon	SaasSaastal	Stelvio PassPasso dello Stelvio	Vals 3000Vals	ChampexChampex	HabkernHabkern
Assessment
Decision score	82/100	79/100	75/100	75/100	64/100	60/100	57/100	56/100	39/100
Structural Fit	82/100	79/100	75/100	75/100	64/100	60/100	57/100	56/100	39/100
Current opportunity	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Overall quality	6.0/10	7.8/10	9.2/10	5.8/10	8.7/10	–	–	9.0/10	–
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Low	Medium	Medium	Medium	Medium	Medium	Medium	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	68/100	65/100	76/100	67/100	78/100	75/100	45/100	84/100	40/100
Typical daytime high	3°C	4°C	-2°C	2°C	1°C	-8°Cclear advantage	13°C	2°C	1°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical overnight low	-4°C	-3°C	-7°C	-6°C	-6°C	-14°Cclear advantage	5°C	-7°C	-5°C
Rating	8.1/10	6.7/10	8.1/10	7.0/10	7.4/10	6.8/10	5.3/10	6.4/10	5.0/10
Area size class	150–250 km	20 km or less	250+ km	100–150 km	100–150 km	20 km or less	20–50 km	20 km or less	20 km or less
Ability profile	advanced	advanced	advanced	intermediate	advanced	novice	advanced	novice	expert
Price class	high	avg	high	avg	high	avg	avg	high	avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	175 km	16 km	322 kmclear advantage	142 km	142 km	9 km	25 km	15 km	8 km
Lowest point	1,000 m	1,200 m	1,562 m	700 m	1,472 m	2,760 mclear advantage	1,286 m	1,468 m	1,100 m
Highest point	3,842 m	3,016 m	3,899 m	2,430 m	3,573 m	3,450 m	2,851 m	2,194 m	1,485 m
Vertical range	2,842 mclear advantage	1,816 m	2,337 m	1,730 m	2,101 m	690 m	1,565 m	726 m	385 m
Blue pistes	34%	29%	23%	42%	22%	89%	20%	70%	25%
Red pistes	44%	49%	68%	35%	62%	11%	60%	20%	50%
Black pistes	22%	22%	8%	22%	16%	0%	20%	10%	25%
Terrain above 2,000 m	55%	–	92%clear advantage	32%	57%	–	30%	–	0%
Terrain above 3,000 m	0%	–	21%clear advantage	0%	0%	–	0%	–	0%
Piste-mix diversity	97/100	95/100	74/100	97/100	84/100	50/100	86/100	73/100	95/100
Slope-angle diversity	86/100clear advantage	–	51/100	56/100	68/100	–	49/100	–	14/100
Very/extremely steep terrain	21%clear advantage	–	6%	5%	2%	–	2%	–	0%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mountain snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Fresh snow	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Snow quality	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Open lifts	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	556 pph/km	–	298 pph/km	475 pph/km	289 pph/km	599 pph/km	20 pph/km	167 pph/km	281 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	0.48×	–	0.28×	0.29×	0.28×	0.56×	0.01×	0.19×	0.15×
Terrain per lift	2.5 km/lift	0.9 km/lift	6.3 km/lift	4.1 km/lift	3.6 km/lift	1.5 km/lift	4.2 km/lift	3.8 km/lift	4.0 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	3°C	5°C	0°C	2°C	1°C	-9°C	0°C	-1°C	4°C
Maximum temperature	10°C	14°C	6°C	11°C	7°C	2°C	7°C	4°C	8°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	–	family	–	family	family	–	–	–	–
Piste variety	slopes	–	slopes	slopes	slopes	–	–	–	–
Off-piste	offpiste	offpiste	offpiste	offpiste	–	–	–	–	–
Cross-country	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lift network	–	–	lifts	lifts	lifts	–	–	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–	restaurants	–	restaurants	–	–	–	–
Après-ski	–	–	apresski	apresski	apresski	–	–	–	–
Public transport	transit	–	transit	transit	–	–	transit	–	–
Best airport transfer	63 minclear advantage	–	104 min	88 min	441 min	134 min	–	106 min	–
Skiing per transfer hour	166 km/h transfer	–	186 km/h transfer	97 km/h transfer	19 km/h transfer	4 km/h transfer	–	8 km/h transfer	–

Compare ski resorts

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Chamonix

Chamonix

Resort overview

Chamonix

Val di Sole

Breuil Cervinia

Gaschurn

Saas

Stelvio Pass

Vals 3000

Champex

Habkern

Detailed comparison