Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected9 of 10

ProfileBalanced

ModeStructural

Decision horizon

Recommendation

Decision summary

Val di Sole is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Chamonix is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 3 options have limited evidence coverage.

Effectively tied

Val di Sole

79/100

Why

Val di Sole is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Chamonix is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 3 options have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 23 h ago

Strong overall decision score (79/100).

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeChamonix

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Open webcams Show on map Inspect forecast

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Val di Sole

Lift-system performerEffectively tied

Effectively tied with Chamonix. strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Val di Sole leads Chamonix Terrain fit +10.1 pts and Snow reliability +7.2 pts

Terrain fit +10.1Access -8.8Snow reliability +7.2Snow now -4.0

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeChamonix

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

What could change the resultIncrease scale weight from 16 to 36 and Chamonix becomes the leading option.

Lead margin4.7pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 2–2.

Evidence confidence47%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier5 options

4 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Lowest-regret optionChamonix · 94% robustness

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

ScaleChamonix

Increase scale weight from 16 to 36 and Chamonix becomes the leading option.

16 → 36

Why Val di Sole leads Chamonix · 4.7 pts

Access-8.8 pts

Snow+7.2 pts

Terrain+5.6 pts

Lift system+4.7 pts

Current opportunity-4.0 pts

Scale-1.5 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Val di Sole

#1 · Val di Sole · Italy

Decision79/100

Fit79/100

Now0/100

Quality7.8/10

Now00 cm freshReliability8080/100Terrain7979/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit79.4100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision79.4/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow80/100 · 37% evidence 21.8 / 27.3 pts

Terrain88/100 · 52% evidence 22.0 / 25.0 pts

Scale67/100 · 85% evidence 12.1 / 18.2 pts

Lift system87/100 · 8% evidence 13.9 / 15.9 pts

Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 40%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLift-system performerBest useAdvanced skiing · 81/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area16 km · 1,816 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 79/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Strong reliability match · 80/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Chamonix

#2 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100

Fit82/100

Now29/100

Quality6.0/10

Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts

Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts

Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts

Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 133% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Pettneu am Arlberg

#3 · Pettneu am Arlberg · Austria

Decision69/100

Fit69/100

Now0/100

Quality8.4/10

Now00 cm freshReliability7171/100Terrain6767/100Access7565 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit68.8100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision68.8/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 37% evidence 19.8 / 27.9 pts

Terrain71/100 · 52% evidence 18.3 / 25.6 pts

Scale54/100 · 85% evidence 10.0 / 18.6 pts

Access75/100 · 68% evidence 10.4 / 14.0 pts

Family & value74/100 · 28% evidence 10.4 / 14.0 pts

Lift systemNo data excluded

Data coverage: 45%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useFamily trips · 71/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area15 km · 770 m verticalBest transfer65 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 67/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Scale trails the selected-set median by 13 points.

Breuil Cervinia

#4 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100

Fit75/100

Now22/100

Quality9.2/10

Now2275 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now22.022% weight Decision63.9/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts

Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts

Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts

Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts

Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts

Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow75 cm 7.5 / 30.0 pts

Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts

Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts

Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts

Mid-mountain snow53 cm 1.8 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 40% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.

Strengths

Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#5 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100

Fit64/100

Now0/100

Quality8.7/10

Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts

Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts

Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts

Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts

Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Chiesa

#6 · Chiesa Valmalenco · Italy

Decision64/100

Fit64/100

Now0/100

Quality7.0/10

Now00 cm freshReliability6565/100Terrain6666/100Access49111 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.5100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.5/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow65/100 · 73% evidence 15.6 / 24.0 pts

Terrain72/100 · 80% evidence 15.9 / 22.0 pts

Scale58/100 · 100% evidence 9.3 / 16.0 pts

Lift system67/100 · 8% evidence 9.4 / 14.0 pts

Access49/100 · 68% evidence 5.8 / 12.0 pts

Family & value62/100 · 41% evidence 7.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 65%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 66/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area21 km · 826 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m54%Best transfer111 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 66/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Good reliability match · 65/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Champex

#7 · Champex · Switzerland

Decision56/100

Fit56/100

Now0/100

Quality9.0/10

Now00 cm freshReliability7575/100Terrain5050/100Access48106 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit56.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision56.1/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow75/100 · 37% evidence 18.0 / 24.0 pts

Terrain60/100 · 52% evidence 13.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale51/100 · 100% evidence 8.1 / 16.0 pts

Lift system9/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 14.0 pts

Access48/100 · 68% evidence 5.8 / 12.0 pts

Family & value82/100 · 41% evidence 9.8 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useSnow-first trips · 62/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area15 km · 726 m verticalBest transfer106 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Mixed terrain match · 50/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Good reliability match · 75/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Tschiertschen

#8 · Tschiertschen · Switzerland

Decision52/100

Fit57/100

Now18/100

Quality6.2/10

Now1860 cm upperReliability6060/100Terrain5555/100Access6296 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit57.086% weight Now17.614% weight Decision51.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow60/100 · 73% evidence 14.4 / 24.0 pts

Terrain62/100 · 80% evidence 13.7 / 22.0 pts

Scale68/100 · 100% evidence 10.9 / 16.0 pts

Lift system6/100 · 68% evidence 0.8 / 14.0 pts

Access62/100 · 68% evidence 7.4 / 12.0 pts

Family & value81/100 · 41% evidence 9.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow60 cm 8.6 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow50 cm 6.3 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow56 cm 2.7 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 59/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area32 km · 1,031 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m22%Best transfer96 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 16% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 55/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Solid reliability match · 60/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Riffenmatt

#9 · Riffenmatt · Switzerland

Decision39/100

Fit39/100

Now0/100

Quality–/10

Now00 cm freshReliability3737/100Terrain4040/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit38.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision38.9/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow37/100 · 37% evidence 10.1 / 27.3 pts

Terrain2/100 · 31% evidence 0.4 / 25.0 pts

Scale8/100 · 100% evidence 1.4 / 18.2 pts

Lift system84/100 · 68% evidence 13.3 / 15.9 pts

Family & value100/100 · 18% evidence 13.6 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 43%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 61/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area0 km · 60 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Mixed terrain match · 40/100 — led by strong lift-system evidence and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	Val di SoleVal di Sole	ChamonixChamonix Valley	Pettneu am ArlbergPettneu am Arlberg	Breuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski Paradise	SaasSaastal	ChiesaChiesa Valmalenco	ChampexChampex	TschiertschenTschiertschen	RiffenmattRiffenmatt
Assessment
Decision score	79/100clear advantage	75/100	69/100	64/100	64/100	64/100	56/100	52/100	39/100
Structural Fit	79/100	82/100	69/100	75/100	64/100	64/100	56/100	57/100	39/100
Current opportunity	0/100	29/100clear advantage	0/100	22/100	0/100	0/100	0/100	18/100	0/100
Overall quality	7.8/10	6.0/10	8.4/10	9.2/10	8.7/10	7.0/10	9.0/10	6.2/10	–
Recommendation confidence	Low	Medium	Low	Medium	Medium	Medium	Medium	Medium	Low
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	65/100	68/100	85/100	76/100	78/100	63/100	84/100	59/100	54/100
Typical daytime high	4°C	3°C	2°C	-2°Cclear advantage	1°C	4°C	2°C	2°C	–
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical overnight low	-3°C	-4°C	-5°C	-7°C	-6°C	-2°C	-7°C	-7°C	–
Rating	6.7/10	8.1/10	–	8.1/10	7.4/10	7.4/10	6.4/10	6.0/10	–
Area size class	20 km or less	150–250 km	20 km or less	250+ km	100–150 km	20–50 km	20 km or less	20–50 km	20 km or less
Ability profile	advanced	advanced	advanced	advanced	advanced	advanced	novice	intermediate	novice
Price class	avg	high	avg	high	high	avg	high	high	–
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	16 km	175 km	15 km	322 kmclear advantage	142 km	21 km	15 km	32 km	0 km
Lowest point	1,200 m	1,000 m	1,250 m	1,562 m	1,472 m	1,527 m	1,468 m	1,350 m	1,080 m
Highest point	3,016 m	3,842 m	2,020 m	3,899 m	3,573 m	2,353 m	2,194 m	2,381 m	1,140 m
Vertical range	1,816 m	2,842 mclear advantage	770 m	2,337 m	2,101 m	826 m	726 m	1,031 m	60 m
Blue pistes	29%	34%	33%	23%	22%	19%	70%	47%	100%
Red pistes	49%	44%	53%	68%	62%	57%	20%	44%	0%
Black pistes	22%	22%	13%	8%	16%	24%	10%	9%	0%
Terrain above 2,000 m	–	55%	–	92%clear advantage	57%	54%	–	22%	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	–	0%	–	21%clear advantage	0%	0%	–	0%	–
Piste-mix diversity	95/100	97/100	88/100	74/100	84/100	89/100	73/100	85/100	–
Slope-angle diversity	–	86/100clear advantage	–	51/100	68/100	40/100	–	38/100	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	–	21%clear advantage	–	6%	2%	5%	–	3%	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	Well above typical+133% vs average · 100th percentile	–	Well below typical-40% vs average · 4th percentile	–	–	–	Well below typical-16% vs average · 3th percentile	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–	–	Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile	–	–	–	Well above typical+36% vs average · 100th percentile	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–	–	Close to typical-21% vs average · 46th percentile	–	–	–	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	30 cm	–	19 cm	–	–	–	50 cmclear advantage	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	99 cmclear advantage	–	53 cm	–	–	–	56 cm	–
Mountain snow	–	145 cmclear advantage	–	75 cm	–	–	–	60 cm	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–	–	9.6/10	–	–	–	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–	–	7%	–	–	–	–	–
Open lifts	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	–	556 pph/km	–	298 pph/km	289 pph/km	–	167 pph/km	136 pph/km	1,667 pph/kmclear advantage
Lift-system coverage	–	0.48×	–	0.28×	0.28×	–	0.19×	0.14×	1.00×clear advantage
Terrain per lift	0.9 km/lift	2.5 km/lift	–	6.3 km/lift	3.6 km/lift	2.4 km/lift	3.8 km/lift	8.0 km/lift	0.3 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	4°C	4°C	1°C	1°C	1°C	4°C	-7°C	3°C	4°C
Maximum temperature	15°C	11°C	8°C	9°C	6°C	10°C	-2°C	10°C	7°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	–	–	–	family	–	–	–	–
Piste variety	–	slopes	–	slopes	slopes	–	–	–	–
Off-piste	offpiste	offpiste	–	offpiste	–	–	–	–	–
Cross-country	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lift network	–	–	–	lifts	lifts	–	–	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–	–	restaurants	restaurants	–	–	–	–
Après-ski	–	–	–	apresski	apresski	–	–	–	–
Public transport	–	transit	transit	transit	–	–	–	–	–
Best airport transfer	–	63 min	65 min	104 min	441 min	111 min	106 min	96 min	–
Skiing per transfer hour	–	166 km/h transfer	14 km/h transfer	186 km/h transfer	19 km/h transfer	12 km/h transfer	8 km/h transfer	20 km/h transfer	–

Compare ski resorts

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Val di Sole

Val di Sole

Resort overview

Val di Sole

Chamonix

Pettneu am Arlberg

Breuil Cervinia

Saas

Chiesa

Champex

Tschiertschen

Riffenmatt

Detailed comparison