Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected10 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

10 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Stubaier gletscher is the strongest alternative. 4 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 3 options have limited evidence coverage.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Narrow lead

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Stubaier gletscher is the strongest alternative. 4 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 3 options have limited evidence coverage.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 145 cm.

Supporting data are stale; treat the ranking as provisional.

AlternativeStubaier gletscher
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago3.8 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistNarrow lead

Leads on strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Chamonix leads Stubaier gletscher Terrain fit +7.5 pts
Terrain fit +7.5Snow reliability -3.2Access -0.3Snow now -0.1
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeStubaier gletscher

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultReduce terrain weight from 22 to 2 and Stubaier gletscher becomes the leading option.

Lead margin3.8pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 2–2.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier4 options

6 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Lowest-regret optionStubaier gletscher · 94% robustness
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

TerrainStubaier gletscher

Reduce terrain weight from 22 to 2 and Stubaier gletscher becomes the leading option.

22 → 2
SnowStubaier gletscher

Increase snow weight from 24 to 53 and Stubaier gletscher becomes the leading option.

24 → 53
Family & valueAx les Thermes

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 61 and Ax les Thermes becomes the leading option.

12 → 61
Why Chamonix leads Stubaier gletscher · 3.8 pts
Terrain+4.3 pts
Snow-3.2 pts
Scale+2.2 pts
Lift system+0.9 pts
Access-0.3 pts
Family & value+0.1 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 133% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Stubaier gletscher

#2 · Stubaier gletscher · Austria

Decision71/100
Fit85/100
Now19/100
Quality9.0/10
Now1920 cm upperReliability9595/100Terrain8080/100Access9733 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit85.378% weight Now18.922% weight Decision71.0/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow95/100 · 37% evidence 22.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain70/100 · 52% evidence 15.5 / 22.0 pts
Scale91/100 · 100% evidence 14.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access97/100 · 68% evidence 11.6 / 12.0 pts
Family & value86/100 · 41% evidence 10.3 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow20 cm 2.0 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain33% 6.6 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow1 cm 0.3 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow12 cm 0.4 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useShort breaks · 88/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area65 km · 1,515 m verticalBest transfer33 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 39% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 80/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 95/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Ax les Thermes

#3 · Ax les Thermes Bonascre · France

Decision68/100
Fit69/100
Now64/100
Quality6.0/10
Now64270 cm upperReliability6767/100Terrain6969/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit68.886% weight Now63.814% weight Decision68.1/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow67/100 · 37% evidence 18.3 / 27.3 pts
Terrain73/100 · 52% evidence 18.1 / 25.0 pts
Scale78/100 · 100% evidence 14.1 / 18.2 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 6.2 / 15.9 pts
Family & value88/100 · 41% evidence 12.0 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 51%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow270 cm 38.6 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow120 cm 15.2 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow210 cm 10.0 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 71/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area80 km · 966 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Good reliability match · 67/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Breuil Cervinia

#4 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit75/100
Now22/100
Quality9.2/10
Now2275 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now22.022% weight Decision63.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow75 cm 7.5 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow53 cm 1.8 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 40% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#5 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Landeck

#6 · Venet · Austria

Decision61/100
Fit61/100
Now0/100
Quality5.2/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5757/100Terrain5858/100Access8155 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit60.5100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision60.5/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow57/100 · 73% evidence 13.8 / 24.0 pts
Terrain70/100 · 80% evidence 15.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale60/100 · 100% evidence 9.6 / 16.0 pts
Lift system53/100 · 68% evidence 7.4 / 14.0 pts
Access81/100 · 68% evidence 9.7 / 12.0 pts
Family & value38/100 · 41% evidence 4.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAccess-led destinationBest useAdvanced skiing · 63/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area15 km · 1,432 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m9%Best transfer55 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 58/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Solid reliability match · 57/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Family usability is less distinctive.

Nesselwang

#7 · Ostallgau · Germany

Decision54/100
Fit54/100
Now0/100
Quality4.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3838/100Terrain5454/100Access8235 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit53.8100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision53.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow38/100 · 73% evidence 9.2 / 24.0 pts
Terrain46/100 · 80% evidence 10.1 / 22.0 pts
Scale41/100 · 85% evidence 6.6 / 16.0 pts
Lift system57/100 · 8% evidence 7.9 / 14.0 pts
Access82/100 · 68% evidence 9.8 / 12.0 pts
Family & value85/100 · 41% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 63/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area6 km · 804 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer35 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 54/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 38/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Lackenhof am Otscher

#8 · Lackenhof Ötscher Lower Austria · Austria

Decision51/100
Fit51/100
Now0/100
Quality5.8/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3737/100Terrain6262/100Access18158 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit50.8100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision50.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow37/100 · 73% evidence 8.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain66/100 · 80% evidence 14.5 / 22.0 pts
Scale49/100 · 100% evidence 7.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system61/100 · 68% evidence 8.6 / 14.0 pts
Access18/100 · 68% evidence 2.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value73/100 · 41% evidence 8.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 55/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area16 km · 614 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer158 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 62/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Ridnaun

#9 · Ridnaun · Italy

Decision37/100
Fit37/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4444/100Terrain3535/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit37.3100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision37.3/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow44/100 · 37% evidence 11.9 / 27.3 pts
Terrain4/100 · 31% evidence 1.0 / 25.0 pts
Scale15/100 · 100% evidence 2.8 / 18.2 pts
Lift system70/100 · 68% evidence 11.2 / 15.9 pts
Family & value77/100 · 31% evidence 10.4 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 45%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useFamily trips · 52/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area1 km · 98 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 35/100 — led by strong lift-system evidence and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 44/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Titisee

#10 · Titisee · Germany

Decision36/100
Fit36/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability2727/100Terrain3939/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit35.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision35.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow27/100 · 36% evidence 7.5 / 27.3 pts
Terrain0/100 · 15% evidence 0.0 / 25.0 pts
Scale22/100 · 58% evidence 3.9 / 18.2 pts
Lift system68/100 · 68% evidence 10.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value100/100 · 18% evidence 13.6 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 33%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 57/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area3 km · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 39/100 — led by strong lift-system evidence and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 27/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyStubaier gletscherStubaier gletscherAx les ThermesAx les Thermes BonascreBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalLandeckVenetNesselwangOstallgauLackenhof am OtscherLackenhof Ötscher Lower AustriaRidnaunRidnaunTitiseeTitisee
Assessment
Decision score 75/10071/10068/10064/10064/10061/10054/10051/10037/10036/100
Structural Fit 82/10085/10069/10075/10064/10061/10054/10051/10037/10036/100
Current opportunity 29/10019/10064/100clear advantage22/1000/1000/1000/1000/1000/1000/100
Overall quality 6.0/109.0/106.0/109.2/108.7/105.2/104.0/105.8/10––
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumLowMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumLowLow
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10094/100clear advantage55/10076/10078/10072/10045/10047/10050/10035/100
Typical daytime high 3°C-6°Cclear advantage7°C-2°C1°C4°C3°C5°C4°C3°C
Typical snow/freezing level ––––––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-12°Cclear advantage0°C-7°C-6°C-3°C-4°C-2°C-4°C-3°C
Rating 8.1/107.6/106.7/108.1/107.4/106.5/106.7/106.0/104.4/10–
Area size class 150–250 km50–100 km50–100 km250+ km100–150 km20 km or less20 km or less20 km or less20 km or less20 km or less
Ability profile advancednoviceintermediateadvancedadvancedadvancedintermediateadvancednovicenovice
Price class highavgavghighhighavglowavg–low
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km65 km80 km322 kmclear advantage142 km15 km6 km16 km1 km3 km
Lowest point 1,000 m1,695 m1,380 m1,562 m1,472 m780 m796 m812 m1,386 m–
Highest point 3,842 m3,210 m2,346 m3,899 m3,573 m2,212 m1,600 m1,426 m1,484 m1,060 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage1,515 m966 m2,337 m2,101 m1,432 m804 m614 m98 m–
Blue pistes 34%60%50%23%22%0%51%34%100%100%
Red pistes 44%36%31%68%62%80%41%43%0%0%
Black pistes 22%4%19%8%16%20%7%23%0%0%
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%––92%clear advantage57%9%0%0%––
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%––21%clear advantage0%0%0%0%––
Piste-mix diversity 97/10074/10093/10074/10084/10072/10082/10097/100––
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage––51/10068/10056/10015/10050/100––
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage––6%2%2%1%3%––
Historical context
Historical snow resilience ––––––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Snow consistency ––––––––––
Late-winter retention ––––––––––
Lower-mountain retention ––––––––––
Warm-winter resilience ––––––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+133% vs average · 100th percentileBelow typical-39% vs average · 34th percentile–Well below typical-40% vs average · 4th percentile––––––
Valley snow versus typical –Close to typical-100% vs average · 0th percentile–Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile––––––
Open slopes versus typical –Close to typical+2% vs average · 45th percentile–Close to typical-21% vs average · 46th percentile––––––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm0 cm120 cmclear advantage19 cm––––––
Mid-mountain snow 99 cm12 cm210 cmclear advantage53 cm––––––
Mountain snow 145 cm20 cm270 cmclear advantage75 cm––––––
Fresh snow 0 cm1 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality –9.6/10–9.6/10––––––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes –33%clear advantage–7%––––––
Open lifts ––––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km678 pph/km329 pph/km298 pph/km289 pph/km413 pph/km–622 pph/km818 pph/km833 pph/km
Lift-system coverage 0.48×0.38×0.26×0.28×0.28×0.53×–0.37×0.55×0.43×
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift2.5 km/lift3.8 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift2.5 km/lift0.9 km/lift2.2 km/lift1.1 km/lift1.5 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 4°C-14°C2°C1°C1°C6°C2°C3°C1°C1°C
Maximum temperature 11°C-4°C10°C9°C6°C13°C9°C8°C11°C8°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability –family––family–––––
Piste variety slopes––slopesslopes–––––
Off-piste offpiste––offpiste––––––
Cross-country ––––––––––
Lift network –lifts–liftslifts–––––
Mountain restaurants –––restaurantsrestaurants–––––
Après-ski –––apresskiapresski–––––
Public transport transittransit–transit–transittransit–––
Best airport transfer 63 min33 min–104 min441 min55 min35 min158 min––
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer118 km/h transfer–186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer16 km/h transfer10 km/h transfer6 km/h transfer––