Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected10 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

10 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Bruneck is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 84/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, good reliability match · 66/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Chamonix is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 4 options have limited evidence coverage.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Effectively tied

Bruneck

78/100
Why
  1. Bruneck is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 84/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, good reliability match · 66/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Chamonix is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 4 options have limited evidence coverage.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago
  • Strong overall decision score (78/100).

Supporting data are stale; treat the ranking as provisional.

AlternativeChamonix
Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.
Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago3.3 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Bruneck

Advanced-terrain specialistEffectively tied

Effectively tied with Chamonix. strong terrain match · 84/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, good reliability match · 66/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Bruneck leads Chamonix Terrain fit +6.3 pts and Snow reliability +1.2 pts
Terrain fit +6.3Snow now -4.0Snow reliability +1.2Access -0.3
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeChamonix

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

What could change the resultIncrease access weight from 12 to 46 and Cesana becomes the leading option.

Lead margin3.3pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 2–2.

Evidence confidence62%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier5 options

2 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Lowest-regret optionChamonix · 94% robustness
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

AccessCesana

Increase access weight from 12 to 46 and Cesana becomes the leading option.

12 → 46
Lift systemTannheimertal

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 94 and Tannheimertal becomes the leading option.

14 → 94
Why Bruneck leads Chamonix · 3.3 pts
Current opportunity-4.0 pts
Family & value+2.5 pts
Terrain+1.4 pts
Scale+1.3 pts
Snow+1.2 pts
Lift system+1.1 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Bruneck

#1 · Kronplatz Plan de Corones · Italy

Decision78/100
Fit78/100
Now0/100
Quality6.3/10
Now00 cm freshReliability6666/100Terrain8484/100Access7191 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit78.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision78.1/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow66/100 · 37% evidence 15.8 / 24.0 pts
Terrain81/100 · 52% evidence 17.8 / 22.0 pts
Scale93/100 · 85% evidence 14.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system74/100 · 68% evidence 10.4 / 14.0 pts
Access71/100 · 68% evidence 8.5 / 12.0 pts
Family & value89/100 · 41% evidence 10.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 57%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 80/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area125 km · 1,302 m verticalBest transfer91 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 84/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Good reliability match · 66/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Chamonix

#2 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 133% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Cesana

#3 · La Voie Lactee · Italy

Decision71/100
Fit71/100
Now0/100
Quality9.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7070/100Terrain6767/100Access9254 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit70.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision70.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow70/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale96/100 · 85% evidence 15.3 / 16.0 pts
Lift system24/100 · 68% evidence 3.4 / 14.0 pts
Access92/100 · 68% evidence 11.1 / 12.0 pts
Family & value65/100 · 41% evidence 7.8 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 72/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area400 km · 1,251 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m65%Best transfer54 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 67/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 70/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Tschagguns

#4 · Golm im Montafon · Austria

Decision70/100
Fit70/100
Now0/100
Quality8.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5656/100Terrain7474/100Access7572 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit69.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision69.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow56/100 · 37% evidence 13.4 / 24.0 pts
Terrain72/100 · 52% evidence 15.8 / 22.0 pts
Scale78/100 · 100% evidence 12.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system63/100 · 68% evidence 8.8 / 14.0 pts
Access75/100 · 68% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts
Family & value85/100 · 41% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 72/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area27 km · 1,450 m verticalBest transfer72 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 74/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 56/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Scale trails the selected-set median by 18 points.

Tannheimertal

#5 · Vitales Land · Austria

Decision69/100
Fit69/100
Now0/100
Quality4.9/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5353/100Terrain7676/100Access65102 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit68.8100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision68.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow53/100 · 37% evidence 12.6 / 24.0 pts
Terrain58/100 · 52% evidence 12.8 / 22.0 pts
Scale83/100 · 85% evidence 13.3 / 16.0 pts
Lift system86/100 · 8% evidence 12.1 / 14.0 pts
Access65/100 · 68% evidence 7.8 / 12.0 pts
Family & value84/100 · 41% evidence 10.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 48%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 72/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area138 km · 723 m verticalBest transfer102 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 76/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 53/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain trails the selected-set median by 16 points.

Breuil Cervinia

#6 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit75/100
Now22/100
Quality9.2/10
Now2275 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now22.022% weight Decision63.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow75 cm 7.5 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow53 cm 1.8 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 40% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#7 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Saint Vincent

#8 · Col de Joux · Italy

Decision44/100
Fit44/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability6262/100Terrain3737/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit44.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision44.0/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow62/100 · 37% evidence 16.9 / 27.3 pts
Terrain27/100 · 16% evidence 6.9 / 25.0 pts
Scale27/100 · 27% evidence 5.0 / 18.2 pts
Lift system37/100 · 8% evidence 5.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value69/100 · 13% evidence 9.4 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 19%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationSnow reliabilityHighSki area– · 340 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected date
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 37/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 62/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Chatillon

#9 · · Italy

Decision–/100
Fit–/100
Now–/100
Quality–/10
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

AccessNo data excluded
Family & valueNo data excluded
Lift systemNo data excluded
ScaleNo data excluded
SnowNo data excluded
TerrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeEvidence-limited destinationSnow reliabilityNot availableSki area– · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected date
Strengths
  • The destination remains scoreable, but there is not enough evidence for a strong archetype.
Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Martigny

#10 · · Switzerland

Decision–/100
Fit–/100
Now–/100
Quality–/10
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

AccessNo data excluded
Family & valueNo data excluded
Lift systemNo data excluded
ScaleNo data excluded
SnowNo data excluded
TerrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeEvidence-limited destinationSnow reliabilityNot availableSki area– · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected date
Strengths
  • The destination remains scoreable, but there is not enough evidence for a strong archetype.
Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeBruneckKronplatz Plan de CoronesChamonixChamonix ValleyCesanaLa Voie LacteeTschaggunsGolm im MontafonTannheimertalVitales LandBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalSaint VincentCol de JouxChatillonItalyMartignySwitzerland
Assessment
Decision score 78/10075/10071/10070/10069/10064/10064/10044/100––
Structural Fit 78/10082/10071/10070/10069/10075/10064/10044/100––
Current opportunity 0/10029/100clear advantage0/1000/1000/10022/1000/1000/100––
Overall quality 6.3/106.0/109.0/108.0/104.9/109.2/108.7/10–––
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumLowMediumMediumLowLowLow
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 60/10068/10065/10049/10049/10076/10078/10062/100––
Typical daytime high 2°C3°C0°C5°C2°C-2°Cclear advantage1°C3°C––
Typical snow/freezing level ––––––––––
Typical overnight low -5°C-4°C-7°C-2°C-4°C-7°C-6°C-6°C––
Rating 7.5/108.1/106.8/106.9/106.3/108.1/107.4/106.9/10––
Area size class 100–150 km150–250 km250+ km20–50 km100–150 km250+ km100–150 km–––
Ability profile intermediateadvancedadvancedintermediateintermediateadvancedadvanced–––
Price class avghighlowavgavghighhigh–––
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 125 km175 km400 kmclear advantage27 km138 km322 km142 km–––
Lowest point 973 m1,000 m1,538 m650 m1,160 m1,562 m1,472 m1,640 m––
Highest point 2,275 m3,842 m2,789 m2,100 m1,883 m3,899 m3,573 m1,980 m––
Vertical range 1,302 m2,842 mclear advantage1,251 m1,450 m723 m2,337 m2,101 m340 m––
Blue pistes 48%34%24%50%58%23%22%–––
Red pistes 29%44%55%45%31%68%62%–––
Black pistes 23%22%21%6%11%8%16%–––
Terrain above 2,000 m –55%65%––92%clear advantage57%–––
Terrain above 3,000 m –0%0%––21%clear advantage0%–––
Piste-mix diversity 96/10097/10091/10079/10084/10074/10084/100–––
Slope-angle diversity –86/100clear advantage37/100––51/10068/100–––
Very/extremely steep terrain –21%clear advantage3%––6%2%–––
Historical context
Historical snow resilience ––––––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Snow consistency ––––––––––
Late-winter retention ––––––––––
Lower-mountain retention ––––––––––
Warm-winter resilience ––––––––––
Mountain snow versus typical –Well above typical+133% vs average · 100th percentile–––Well below typical-40% vs average · 4th percentile––––
Valley snow versus typical –––––Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile––––
Open slopes versus typical –––––Close to typical-21% vs average · 46th percentile––––
Current snow
Valley snow –30 cm–––19 cm––––
Mid-mountain snow –99 cmclear advantage–––53 cm––––
Mountain snow –145 cmclear advantage–––75 cm––––
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm––
Snow quality –––––9.6/10––––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes –––––7%––––
Open lifts ––––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 633 pph/km556 pph/km254 pph/km616 pph/km–298 pph/km289 pph/km–––
Lift-system coverage 0.37×0.48×clear advantage0.19×0.37×–0.28×0.28×–––
Terrain per lift 3.9 km/lift2.5 km/lift5.8 km/lift3.0 km/lift4.9 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift–––
Weather
Minimum temperature 2°C4°C5°C4°C1°C1°C1°C6°C8°C12°C
Maximum temperature 14°C11°C14°C14°C9°C9°C6°C11°C17°C18°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability family–familyfamily––family–––
Piste variety slopesslopesslopes––slopesslopes–––
Off-piste –offpisteoffpiste––offpiste––––
Cross-country crosscountry–––––––––
Lift network lifts––lifts–liftslifts–––
Mountain restaurants restaurants––––restaurantsrestaurants–––
Après-ski –––––apresskiapresski–––
Public transport –transittransit–transittransit––––
Best airport transfer 91 min63 min54 min72 min102 min104 min441 min–––
Skiing per transfer hour 82 km/h transfer166 km/h transfer444 km/h transferclear advantage22 km/h transfer81 km/h transfer186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer–––